Sound pressure level at vacuum cleaner and earphones

AI Thread Summary
Vacuum cleaners typically produce sound levels around 70 dBa, while earphones can reach up to 100 dBa, yet the perception of loudness differs significantly. The sound level for earphones is measured when worn, resulting in higher pressure at the eardrum due to the sealed environment, while vacuum cleaner noise travels through the air and vibrates building structures, making it audible even through walls. This structural vibration contributes to the vacuum cleaner's persistent sound, which can be heard at greater distances compared to earphones. Therefore, despite similar dBa ratings, the actual experience of loudness varies due to the different ways sound is transmitted and perceived. Understanding these factors clarifies why earphones may not seem as loud as a vacuum cleaner despite their specifications.
Radek01
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have read that vacuum cleaner makes 70 dBa and earplugs can easily go beyond this.

The problem I have is that I can hear my neighbor's vacuum cleaner thru wall easily. But if I set my mp3 player at max (should be around 100dBa according to manufacturer) I can heard this at few meters max.

I have also set my earplugs to those 70 dBa (I compared both sounds and set the loudness that is most similar to each other). Still I can hear my vacuum cleaner everywhere in my flat, but my earphones can hardly be heard at a distance of one meter.

My question is why I can't hear my earphones as loud as vacuum cleaner if they are supposed to have similar loudness?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sound levels for devices like a vacuum cleaner are usually given as the sound level 1 meter from the device.

Sound levels for earphones are the sound level you hear when you are actually wearing them. Obviosuly they are much closer to you ear than 1 meter away, but also the volume of air between the phone and you eardrum is almost "airtight", which means the pressure level at your eardrum is higher than if you measured the sound level a few millimeters away from the phones when they were NOT being worn.

Another effect is that if a vacuum cleaner is standing on the floor, some of the sound you hear is coming from the whole structure of the house being vibrated by the cleaner, not just the sound transmitted through the air. That partly explains why the sound level doesn't seem to decay much if you are further from the cleaner, and why you can hear it easily through walls etc.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top