Sound waves patterns produced by rifle fire

AI Thread Summary
When firing a rifle, the sound wave patterns can cause uneven ear damage, with the left ear often experiencing more impact than the right, despite the right ear being closer to the chamber. This phenomenon may be attributed to the rifle's crack being generated as the bullet exits the barrel, creating a pressure wave that affects the left ear more due to head positioning. The right ear is also aligned more directly with the barrel, potentially resulting in a softer pressure wave. Additionally, the effectiveness of hearing protection may vary based on stance and ear muff positioning. Overall, factors such as sound wave dynamics and individual shooting posture contribute to the differential ear damage experienced.
Frannas
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I,ve noticed that when I fire a rifle that my left ear feels the most damage were my right ear feels allmost no damage. How can that be when my right ear is closest to the rifle chamber? I am right-handed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say it may happen for following reason.

The first is that the rifle's crack is not produced in the chamber, it's going to be largely produced as the bullet exits the barrel. This comes from the sonic boom of the round and the pressure from the expanding gase that follow behind the bullet. When you fire the rifle, your right ear is going to be held down a little because you need to cock your head a bit to bring it over the barrel along the sights. So this could bring your left ear into more exposure to the pressure wave from the barrel. Finally, your right ear is going to be more along the line of the barrel than the left. I would expect that the pressure wave is perturbed more along the barrel than offset from it and so the pressure may be a bit softer on the right than the left.

Or it could be that your stance lessens the effectiveness of your hearing protection over your left ear. I never could stand using muffs because I usually shifted the muff a bit when I got into position so I always wore plugs. I don't know though, my hearing loss is in my right ear though I don't know if that comes from shooting or if was sourced from other problems (I know I started to get tinnitus in that ear after a really bad three day bout of migraines.).
 
:devil:
Could be the empty space is acting as a resonator and amplifying the sound.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top