Space expansion on smaller scales

AI Thread Summary
Space is expanding, as evidenced by the redshift of distant objects, but this expansion has negligible effects on smaller scales, such as within galaxies or between planets. The gravitational forces within galaxies counteract the expansion, preventing them from being pulled apart. While the expansion of space does occur, it primarily affects vast intergalactic distances rather than adjacent galaxies, which remain gravitationally bound. The movement of galaxies is attributed to their initial momentum from the Big Bang rather than the expansion of space itself. Overall, the consensus is that local gravitational forces dominate over the effects of cosmic expansion on smaller scales.
Galap
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Space is expanding. This is evident from the redshift of distant objects.

My question is what effect does it have on smaller scales? Since the expansion of space carries objects along with it (necessary for the objects to be farther) wouldn't the expansion within galaxies slowly pull them apart? wouldn't the expansion on planets exert a minute outward pressure? on smaller objects?

Of course due to the small distances involved (since the stretching of space is cumulative over distance i.e. that unit of length expands x, as does the next one) and the large timescales required, these effects would be miniscule, but they would be present, right?

Or is the fact that the galaxies are moving with the expansion not due to causation but due to a root common cause: i.e. space is expanding, but it does not carry objects with it. The reason galaxies move along with the expanding space is only due to their initial outward momentum from the big bang.

Which (if either) seems to be the correct model as to our current understanding? I'm a little bit confused...
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You should do a search..this has been discussed many,many times. Or search Hubble expansion...here or Wikipedia.

The gravity holding galaxies together prevents expansion within galaxies...the universe expands only over vast intergalatic distances...adjacent galaxies are essentially not affected...for example, our Milky Way galaxy is going to collide with our nearest neighbor galaxy, the Andromeda galaxy
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top