Spacetime Interval in non-inertial frames.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the invariance of the spacetime interval in non-inertial frames compared to inertial frames. Participants explore the implications of transformations on the line element and the nature of the metric tensor in different contexts, including flat spacetime and general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the spacetime interval ds^2 = -(cdt)^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 is invariant in inertial frames, questioning its invariance in non-inertial frames.
  • Others propose that while there is still an invariant interval in non-inertial frames, its form will differ from that in inertial frames.
  • One participant describes how the line element can change under certain transformations, providing an example of a transformation that alters the form of the line element.
  • Another participant mentions that the invariant interval can be represented as a quadratic form, suggesting that the coefficients of this form can be represented by a matrix known as the metric.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the metric tensor, with some participants stating that it remains constant in flat spacetime, while others clarify that it can vary in general spacetime.
  • One participant introduces the concept of a "killing vector field," indicating that the metric tensor does not change along certain vector fields.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to specify the context of the metric tensor when discussing its constancy in different frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the invariance of the spacetime interval in non-inertial frames, with some asserting it changes form while others maintain it remains invariant in a broader sense. The discussion reflects multiple competing perspectives on the nature of the metric tensor and its behavior in various contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific transformations and their effects on the line element, as well as the role of the metric tensor in different spacetime scenarios. There are unresolved aspects regarding the implications of these transformations and the conditions under which the metric tensor may vary.

The1337gamer
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
The interval between two events ds^2 = -(cdt)^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 is invariant in inertial frames. I was wondering, if this same interval still applies and is invariant in non-inertial frames?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The form of the line element will be the same if the coords (t,x,y,z) are transformed by a member of the Poincare group of transformations.

But other transformations can change the form of the line element. For instance if we go to (u,v,y,z)

u = x-t
v= x+t
y=y
z=z

then the line element becomes ds2 = -2dudv + dy2 + dz2
 
There is still an invariant interval, but it will no longer take that form in a non-inertial frame.
 
The1337gamer said:
The interval between two events ds^2 = -(cdt)^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 is invariant in inertial frames. I was wondering, if this same interval still applies and is invariant in non-inertial frames?

In general the invariant interval will be a quadratic form ,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quadratic_form&oldid=467500079.

If your generalized coordinates are t,x,y,z and you have to points, represented by coordinates t1,x1,y1,z1 and t2,x2,y2,z2, then your quadratic form for the interval will have variables dt,dx,dy,dz -- where dt = t2-t1, dx=x2-x1, dy=y2-y1, dz=z2-z1. For example, it might be (just to illustrate the concept clearly)

-0.8 dt^2 + 1.3 dx^2 + 1.2 dy^2 + 1.1 dz^2The coefficents of the quadratic form can be represented by a matrix - the wiki article talks a bit about this - if you want a more detailed treatment it should be covered in books about linear algebra. This matrix is called the "metric", which hopefully you've at least herad mentioned.
 
Your question has really been answered, so sorry if some think this is over kill, but I'll write down the interval for you too, since it hasn't been written yet in this thread, just mentioned.
[tex] c^2 \, d\tau^2=ds^2=g_{\alpha\beta}dx^{\alpha}dx^{\beta}=dx_{\alpha}dx^{\alpha}[/tex]
This is a geometric invariant. Hope this helps a little.
 
Thanks for the feedback. I know a bit about the metric tensor, it is a bilinear form that takes two vectors from the tangent space of our spacetime to a scalar, i think.

So i think I am correct in saying the 4x4 matrix representing the metric is the same on all points in flat spacetime (minkowski space).

I haven't read much into GR yet, but in the general spacetime, does the metric tensor change at each point in the space?
 
In general, the metric tensor will change as you move from point to point in space-time. If the metric tensor does not change as you move along a certain vector field, then that vector field is a so-called "killing vector field".
 
The1337gamer said:
So i think I am correct in saying the 4x4 matrix representing the metric is the same on all points in flat spacetime (minkowski space).
Yes, except that you need to specify that you are talking about an inertial frame or orthonormal basis. The components of the metric expressed in e.g. a rotating frame will not be the same at all points in flat spacetime.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 141 ·
5
Replies
141
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K