Special Relativity - Dynamics -- Traveling in Space

Barry Melby
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
Assume that 437 days is a reasonable limit for how long a human can endure constant-velocity space travel. Proxima Centauri, the star closest to our Sun, is 4.24 light years away from Earth.

If you wanted to fly to Proxima Centauri within the 437-day limit in a rocket of mass 2.00×10^6 kg , how much energy would be required to accelerate the rocket to the necessary speed in the Earth reference frame? For this rough estimate, ignore the energy required to stop, and disregard the hundreds of days required at each end of the journey for acceleration.

Homework Equations


K = (1-y)mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried to attempt this solution, but it seems impossible as you would have to travel faster than the speed of light to get there in 437 days. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Barry Melby said:

Homework Statement


[/B]
Assume that 437 days is a reasonable limit for how long a human can endure constant-velocity space travel. Proxima Centauri, the star closest to our Sun, is 4.24 light years away from Earth.

If you wanted to fly to Proxima Centauri within the 437-day limit in a rocket of mass 2.00×10^6 kg , how much energy would be required to accelerate the rocket to the necessary speed in the Earth reference frame? For this rough estimate, ignore the energy required to stop, and disregard the hundreds of days required at each end of the journey for acceleration.

Homework Equations


K = (1-y)mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried to attempt this solution, but it seems impossible as you would have to travel faster than the speed of light to get there in 437 days. Where am I going wrong?
Are you taking into account time dilation? he 437 days will be time elapsed aboard the ship, not as measured from Earth (that will be much larger).
 
nrqed said:
Are you taking into account time dilation? he 437 days will be time elapsed aboard the ship, not as measured from Earth (that will be much larger).

how would i go about time dilation in this case?
 
Barry Melby said:
how would i go about time dilation in this case?
Time on Earth = ##\gamma ## times time on the spaceship. This equation contains two unknowns: gamma(which depends on the speed) and the time delay on Earth. So you need a second equation containing these two unknowns and then you can solve.
 
nrqed said:
Time on Earth = ##\gamma ## times time on the spaceship. This equation contains two unknowns: gamma(which depends on the speed) and the time delay on Earth. So you need a second equation containing these two unknowns and then you can solve.
i can't find ##\gamma##
 
Barry Melby said:
i can't find ##\gamma##

Finding ##\gamma## is easy enough if you know the travel velocity ##v##. Remember the formula for ##\gamma##?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top