Special Relativity Equation: Is This Accurate?

Ryan Bruch
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
While surfing the internet, I came across a statement that this is the equation for special relativity:

Line 1: x = a + b
Line 2: x = a + b (c2/c2) with c = speed of light
Line 3: x = a + (y/c2) if y = b(c2)

Is this really the one? If not, is it relevant at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what those equations are, I have never seen them before. Also, they seem to all be the same since the c's will cancel from top to bottom and you'll just get x=a+b for all 3 "lines".
 
Ryan Bruch said:
While surfing the internet, I came across a statement that this is the equation for special relativity:

Line 1: x = a + b
Line 2: x = a + b (c2/c2) with c = speed of light
Line 3: x = a + (y/c2) if y = b(c2)

Is this really the one? If not, is it relevant at all?

This seems to be some garbled version of the Lorentz transform, but it's not coherent enough for me to be to be sure, as there is no explanation of what the equations mean. For more details on the Lorentz transform, see for instance the wiki article at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lorentz_transformation&oldid=628048814

The Lorentz transform provides a transformation between the coordinates in two different inertial frames, moving relative to each other with velocity v. Because every event in space-time has one and only one set of coordinates, there is a 1:1 mapping between events and their coordinates. This implies there is also a 1:1 mapping between the coordinates between any two inertial frames, including the particular case we are interested in where the two inertial frames are in relative motion. The Lorentz transform provides this 1:1 mapping explicitly. Letting the coordinates in the first inertial frame (presumed stationary) be (t, x,y,z), and the coordinates in the second inertial frame (assumed to be moving with velocity v relative to the first inertial frame) be (t', x' y', z'), we can write the Lorentz transform as:

##t' = \gamma \left(t - vx/c^2\right) \quad x' = \gamma \left(x - vt \right) \quad y' = y \quad z'=z##

Here v is the velocity between frames, and ##\gamma = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}##
 
Last edited:
Ryan Bruch said:
While surfing the internet, I came across a statement..
How about providing a link to the statement so we can see the context?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top