Special Relativity kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on calculating kinetic energy in special relativity, a user attempts to find the total kinetic energy of two protons moving at 0.500c using the equation K = γ(1/2)mv^2. However, this approach is criticized for relying on a non-relativistic formula, which is not valid at high speeds. The correct relativistic kinetic energy formula is K = (γ - 1)mc^2, which accounts for relativistic effects. The user questions the accuracy of their calculations compared to textbook answers, highlighting common discrepancies in physics resources. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using appropriate equations for relativistic scenarios.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


In reference frame S', two protons, each moving at .500c, approach each other head-on. a) calculate the total kinetic energy of the two protons in frame S'. b) Calculate the total kinetic energy of the protons as seen in the reference frame S, which is moving with one of the protons.



Homework Equations


E = mc^2 + K
K = γ1/2mv^2
Proton rest mass = 938 MeV/c^2

The Attempt at a Solution


So for part A I just found the kinetic energy of one of the protons given by γ(1/2)mv^2
(1.1547)(1/2)(938)(.25) * 2 = 270 MeV.. and the back of the book says 290 MeV.. but this textbook is known for having a lot of wrong answers, can anyone verify whether I am correct or incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get 290.22MeV Note:
##K=(\gamma-1)mc^2## because ##E=\gamma mc^2##
 
what is incorrect about my method of using the equation K = γ1/2mv^2 to obtain the answer?
 
PsychonautQQ said:
what is incorrect about my method of using the equation K = γ1/2mv^2 to obtain the answer?
It looks like you just took the non-relativistic expression for KE (1/2mv^2), which is only good for low speeds, and thought you could make it relativistically correct by slapping on a gamma. But that doesn't work. Simon Bridge gave the correct formula.
 
PsychonautQQ said:
what is incorrect about my method of using the equation K = γ1/2mv^2 to obtain the answer?
DocAl is correct - ##K\neq \gamma\frac{1}{2}mv^2##
What lead you to believe the equation would be correct?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top