Special Relativity Length Expansion?

AI Thread Summary
Length contraction in special relativity cannot be directly observed by a single observer, as demonstrated through a scenario involving a moving rod and an observer positioned off the x-axis. When the rod moves towards the observer, the observer perceives a length greater than L, the contracted length, due to the timing of light reaching them from both ends of the rod. If the observer is positioned close to the rod, they may perceive a length even greater than the proper length L_0, due to the effects of light travel time. The discussion highlights the complexities of measuring lengths in relativistic contexts and the potential for misinterpretation based on the observer's position. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the implications of special relativity.
gnulinger
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Like time dilation, length contraction cannot be seen directly by a single observer. To explain this claim, imagine a rod of proper length L_0 moving along the x-axis of frame S and an observer standing away from the x-axis and to the right of the whole rod. Carefully measurement of the rod's length at anyone instant in the frame S would, of course, give the result L = L_0/gamma...

(b) Show that the observer would see (and a camera would record) a length more than L. [It helps to imagine that the x-axis is marked with a graduated scale.]

(c) Show that if the observer is standing close beside the track, he will see a length that is actually more than L_0; that is, the length contraction is distorted into an expansion.


Homework Equations



L = L_0/gamma
gamma = 1/(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2)


The Attempt at a Solution


Let's say that the rod is moving away from the observer. At one instant, light from the back of the rod will reach him at the same time as light from the front of the rod--which left earlier. Hence the observer sees a shorter rod. I don't understand why the length would be more than L, or why it would be more than L_0 if you were close to the rod.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say that the rod is moving away from the observer. At one instant, light from the back of the rod will reach him at the same time as light from the front of the rod--which left earlier. Hence the observer sees a shorter rod.

Yes, that's true. However, if the rod is moving towards the observer, the observer sees a longer rod. The question is badly worded.

I don't understand why the length would be more than L, or why it would be more than L_0 if you were close to the rod.

You've basically already proven that the length would be more than L if the rod were moving towards the observer. To prove that it would be more than L_0, assume that the observer is directly in the path of the rod. Assume that light left the front at tf, and left the back at tb. Can you calculate the apparent length of the rod?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
166
Views
14K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top