Special relativity - observing spinning objects

Mentz114
Messages
5,429
Reaction score
292
I did a thought experiment - suppose we have a simple clock comprising a disc rotating with constant angular velocity. We can read off time inervals by counting the revs.

Another observer, passing at constant velocity will see the disc rotating at a slower rate, since moving clocks run slower.

Does this mean that all spinning objects appear to be spinning slower from another frame ?

In other words, does angular velocity transform like time in SR ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mentz114 said:
I did a thought experiment - suppose we have a simple clock comprising a disc rotating with constant angular velocity. We can read of time inervals by counting the revs.

Another observer, passing at constant velocity will see the disc rotating at a slower rate, since moving clocks run slower.

Does this mean that all spinning objects appear to be spinning slower from another frame ?

In other words, does angular velocity transform like time in SR ?

Yes, I think your observation is correct.

Eugene.
 
Hi Eugene,
yes, it seems inevitable. It is a bit puzzling because angular velocity has dimension of reciprocal time.

I wonder if angular momentum transforms the same ?

M
 
Last edited:
Mentz114 said:
Hi Eugene,
yes, it sems inevitable. It is a bit puzzling because angular velocity has dimension of reciprocal time.

To be more precise, I think that the rotation period of a moving object should increase by the factor \gamma = (1-v^2/c^2)^{-1/2}. Then the rotation speed of such an object should go down, i.e., the factor is \gamma^{-1}.

Eugene.
 
Agreed. Nothing to it. It's only a kinematic effect in any case. Thanks for the input.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top