Special Relativity: Photoproduction of Mesons?

mintsnapple
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


12-16 K + mesons can be photoproduced by the reaction γ + p → K+ + Λ where the initial proton is at rest in the lab. From the conservation laws, discover if it is possible for either the K+ or the Λ to be at rest in the lab, and for what photon energy (in terms of the particle masses) this could happen.

Homework Equations


E^2 = p^2c^2 + m^2c^4
p = mv
E = mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution


2upzqbq.png


I'm really stuck on this problem. It's probably more of an algebraic answer, because I believe I'm supposed to somehow get the two equations of energy and momentum conservation to have like terms and then combine them somehow, but I'm at a loss as to what to do. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you already have the equations.
Conservation of Momentum: \displaystyle{p_\gamma =p_\Lambda \Rightarrow E_\gamma =p_\Lambda c\Rightarrow E_\gamma ^2=E_\Lambda ^2-m_\Lambda ^2c^4}
If you combine this with the conservation of energy you have two equations and two uknowns, \displaystyle{E_\gamma } and \displaystyle{E_\Lambda}.

Another way to solve such problems without algebraic difficulties is by using the momentum 4-vector (also known as 4-momentum). In this problem the calculations are not so tough, because there are only two momenta, so the 4-momentum solution is not much different. But I think it's worth reading about this method, because sometimes it's really helpful.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top