Special Relativity: Rocket Signal Reception Time and Frequency Shift

AI Thread Summary
A rocket traveling at 0.6c relative to a space station experiences time dilation and frequency shifts due to the relativistic Doppler effect. Observers on the space station see the rocket receiving signals emitted every second, while the rocket's frame measures these signals as occurring every 1.25 seconds due to time dilation. The rocket will receive 500 signals after 1000 seconds in its own frame, while the space station will have transmitted 800 signals during that time. The wavelength of light emitted from the station and observed by the rocket shifts from 500nm to 1000nm, consistent with the calculated relativistic effects. The discussion highlights the complexities of applying relativistic principles to signal reception and time measurement.
physiks
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket of proper length 100m travels at a speed 0.6c relative to a space station, which is on the rocket’s flight path.

I have so far had to work out that:
According to an observer on the space station, the nose of the rocket is a distance of 200m away from the station upon receiving the signal. This occurs at a time t=200/c, and that light of wavelength 500nm emitted from the station is observed at 1000nm in the rocket frame.

The space station continues to transmit signals every second (according to its own clock). At what time has the rocket received 500 signals as measured by its own clock? How many signals according to an observer on the space station have been transmitted during the corresponding time period?

Homework Equations


Length contraction, time dilation, relativistic doppler effect.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm very confused about this, as it seems to be a simple doppler effect problem to me. I.e the 1 second time period translates to 2 seconds in the rocket frame, and then the rocket has received 500 signals after 1000s in its frame. However this isn't right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
according to the ship, the station clock runs slow.
 
Simon Bridge said:
according to the ship, the station clock runs slow.

In the station frame, a signal is emitted every t'=1s - this is a proper time. The lorentz factor γ=1.25 here. Therefore somebody on the spaceship sees the signals emitted every γt'=1.25s, i.e the time is dilated. Isn't this true?
 
Anybody?
 
This problem is overdetermined and inconsistent. The wavelength data is not consistent with the relative speed data. Try using the Relativistic Doppler effect formula.
 
dauto said:
This problem is overdetermined and inconsistent. The wavelength data is not consistent with the relative speed data. Try using the Relativistic Doppler effect formula.

Hmm those are previous parts to the question that I have already answered. How is the wavelength inconsistent with the speed data?

λ=λ'√(1+β)/√(1-β)
β=0.6
λ=2λ'
λ=2*500nm
λ=1000nm
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top