Special Relativity Velocity Transformation

mike_romeo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm struggling with a special relativity question

Two particles are traveling in an inertial frame in perpendicular directions to each other at velocity v. Calculate the velocity of each particle relative to the other


I'm not sure how to approach it. In the past any velocity transformations I have done have always been for particles traveling in the same or opposite directions, not orthogonally?


Any help appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If one of the particles (particle I) was intelligent and was able to 'see' the other one, it would see that the other particle was coming in at an angle, which is due to particle I moving toward the other particle and also due to how the other particle is moving in the given direction.
 
Hi mike romeo, welcome to PF!:smile:

Try treating the problem using 3 frames of reference; the lab frame S, particle 1's rest frame S' and particle 2's rest frame S''...set up your coordinate axes however you want and then calculate away...
 
Thanks for the replies, sorry for taking a while to get back to you both.

I got it in the end after countless pages of working out trying different methods and the ones you mentioned.

Thanks again
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top