Specific Heat Capacity & Temperature

AI Thread Summary
Temperature is defined as the average molecular kinetic energy, leading to the question of how energy input into a material is divided between kinetic energy and other energy forms. Different substances exhibit varying specific heat capacities because they store energy differently, with some allocating more energy to non-kinetic forms such as rotational or vibrational modes. The discussion highlights that only translational motion contributes to temperature, while other internal motions can absorb energy without increasing temperature. This explains why the same energy input can result in different temperature changes across materials. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the concept of specific heat capacity in physics.
Christopher M
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question, just a question about physics that seems too basic to post in the main physics discussion forum. Please let me know if it is misplaced.

Temperature is average molecular kinetic energy. Is it therefore correct to say that a material's specific heat capacity depends entirely on the following question: when you put energy into the material, how does it divide that energy up between, on the one hand, kinetic energy of molecules, and on the other hand, other forms of energy?

In other words, is the reason that different substances have different specific heat capacities simply that some substances, when they take in energy, store it in forms other than molecular kinetic energy?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Christopher M said:
Temperature is average molecular kinetic energy. Is it therefore correct to say that a material's specific heat capacity depends entirely on the following question: when you put energy into the material, how does it divide that energy up between, on the one hand, kinetic energy of molecules, and on the other hand, other forms of energy?

In other words, is the reason that different substances have different specific heat capacities simply that some substances, when they take in energy, store it in forms other than molecular kinetic energy?

Hi Christopher! Welcome to PF! :smile:

If we're talking about a solid, I've always assumed that the different specific heat capacities are because the molecules vibrate back and forth differently because they're more or less strongly bound.

I don't see what other forms (than kinetic energy) the energy could go into. :confused:
 


Thanks for the response!

But if energy goes into making the molecules vibrate back and forth more energetically, doesn't that increase temperature (since temperature is average kinetic energy)?

In other words, if all the energy goes into kinetic energy -- and temperature is average kinetic energy -- how could the same amount of energy cause the temperature of different materials to rise by different amounts?
 
Christopher M said:
Thanks for the response!

But if energy goes into making the molecules vibrate back and forth more energetically, doesn't that increase temperature (since temperature is average kinetic energy)?

In other words, if all the energy goes into kinetic energy -- and temperature is average kinetic energy -- how could the same amount of energy cause the temperature of different materials to rise by different amounts?

Hi Christopher! :smile:

Because only the translational vibrations determine the temperature (vie the Boltzmann equation), but a lot of the energy goes into rotational and other internal modes. For more detail, see wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermo...ernal_motions_of_molecules_and_specific_heat" :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top