Specific heat/equilibrium in three component system (Thermo)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a thermodynamics problem involving the equilibrium temperature of a three-component system. The user initially struggles with the lack of mass values but is advised to express all masses and specific heats in terms of one reference mass and specific heat. It is clarified that numerical values are not necessary for the solution, as the equation can be simplified without them. Additionally, temperatures can remain in Celsius instead of converting to Kelvin, as only temperature differences are relevant. The user acknowledges the guidance and recognizes the oversight in their approach.
RadiumBlue
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Rather than retyping the problem, I've uploaded a screenshot here >> http://imgur.com/EB5MrtP

Homework Equations


Q_1 + Q_2 + Q_3 ... = 0
mc \Delta T = Q

The Attempt at a Solution


a. Q_{tea} + Q_{met} + Q_{cr} = 0

I converted the temperatures to K, so T_{cr} and T_{met} = 293.15K, while T_{tea} = 373.15K

Constructing the equation, I got:

0 = (m_{met} * c_{met}* (T_{equil}-293.15)) + (m_{cr} * c_{cr} * (T_{equil}-293.15)) + (m_{tea} * c_{tea} * (T_{equil} - 373.15))

I'm stuck here now, because the problem doesn't give any of the masses, it only relates them to each other. The specific heats I can find because the specific heat of water is a known value, but I'm stuck on the masses. What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the problem is asking you to express the equilibrium temperature in terms of the symbols for the masses and specific heats. If so, you do not need to plug in numerical values for these quantities.
 
TSny said:
I believe the problem is asking you to express the equilibrium temperature in terms of the symbols for the masses and specific heats. If so, you do not need to plug in numerical values for these quantities.

Oh, there's a small part at the bottom that got cropped out, it specifically asks for a numerical value. It also mentions something about using a binomial expansion to solve it, which I didn't understand how it applied to this problem. I've amended the link in the OP with the fixed version.
 
OK. Sorry, I did not see part (c) when I first looked at the problem.

Try expressing all masses in terms of one of the masses, say ##m_{met}##. Likewise, express all specific heats in terms of one of the specific heats, say ##c_{met}##.

You will then find that the equation simplifies such that you do not need any numerical values for the masses or specific heats.

Also, you do not need to express the temperatures in K. You can keep them in oC because you are dealing with temperature differences here.
 
Oh, duh, I see it now. Thank you! I probably should have tried that first, but I just didn't think of it.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top