Specific parts of the emission spectrum of a sodium lamp

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the emission spectrum of a sodium lamp, specifically the origin of a bright red line and the lack of transitions between the s and d electron energy levels. The red line's origin remains unclear, as existing resources primarily focus on the more prominent yellow doublet. For the second part, it is suggested that transitions between the s and d series are hindered by conservation laws, potentially angular momentum, although the exact reason is still uncertain. The participant has explored various sources but found them lacking in detailed explanations. Overall, the inquiry highlights gaps in available literature regarding sodium's emission spectrum.
Einstein2nd
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Part a) The emission spectrum for Sodium lamp contains a reasonably bright red line in its spectrum. What is its origin?

Part b) The possible transitions between electron energy levels for Sodium were analysed. There were no transitions between the s series (s subshell) and d series (d subshell). Why is that?


Homework Equations


None really.


The Attempt at a Solution



Part a) I analysed the diffuse d series and this red line isn't in it. I also analysed the origin of the famous yellow doublet but that really isn't overly relevent. I've done a heap of browsing the web and books and am yet to find anything at all. Most sources simply talk about the yellow doublet

Part b) As I said, I analysed the diffuse d series but these are all transitions between d orbitals and the 3p energy level. I'm thinking something along the lines of not conserving angular momentum or spin or something would prevent transitions between d and s series but I'm really not sure. As with Part a), the web and books have been useless so far so this is a bit of a last resort.

Thank you kindly in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found a database with all known wavelengths but I have no real idea of where the red wavelength is so it's so hard to tell.
 
For part b) I was told it's not to do with conservation of spin. Conservation of angular momentum perhaps?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top