Spectrophotometry area of chemistry

  • Thread starter Thread starter thenewbosco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding spectrophotometry in relation to calculating equilibrium concentrations and constants for a reaction involving AuBr4- and AuBr2-. The user seeks assistance with applying Beer’s Law to determine the concentration of AuBr4- from absorbance data. They correctly identify that the extinction coefficient can be derived from a separate experiment and apply it to their calculations. The importance of using compound-specific extinction coefficients is emphasized, particularly noting that AuBr2- does not absorb at the measured wavelength. Overall, the conversation highlights the application of spectrophotometric principles to chemical equilibrium calculations.
thenewbosco
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
I am not familiar with this area of chemistry. The theory given in the manual doesn't really help. The only thing it says is that absorption is proportional to concentration. Maybe you can give me some assistance on how to get started and some equations that i can use.

The eqilibrium constant for: AuBr_{4}^{-} + 2Au + 2Br^{-} --> 3AuBr_{2}^{-} can be determined by preparing a solution of AuBr_{4}^{-} and AuBr_{2}^{-} in contact with a piece of gold metal.
In one experiment a solution initially containing 6.41x10^{-4} mol/L of dissolved gold (both AuBr_{4}^{-} and AuBr_{2}^{-}) in 0.4 M HBr was allowed to attain equilibrium in the presence of gold metal. The absorbance was 0.445 in a 1.00 cm cell at 382nm.

In a separate experiment, the absorbance of a 8.54x10^{-5}M solution of only AuBr_{4}^{-} (no AuBr_{2}^{-} ) in 0.4 M HBr was determined in a 1.00cm cell to be 0.410 at 382nm. (AuBr_{2}^{-} does not absorb at 382nm.)

a) calculate the equilibrium concentrations and b) evaluate the equilibrium constant.

I can get b) if i knew how to do a) can someone help me with this one?


Thanks
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
here is what i have done can someone tell me if it is correct:

Given that A={\epsilon}cl (from beers law i found on the internet)

I can use this and experiment two to get the {\epsilon} = 0.410/8.54^{-5}=4800.94

Now from this value of epsilon, can i use it with beer's law again to calculate the concentration of AuBr_{4}^{-} in the first experiment with the new A value (.445)?

Then i would have a concentration for AuBr_{4}^{-} and i can subtract it from the combined concentration of 6.41E-4 M, to get [AuBr2].

Is this correct?

thanks
 
You should use compound-specific extinction coefficients, I mean, \displaystyle \epsilon_{{AuCl_4}^-} and \displaystyle \epsilon_{{AuCl_2}^-}

However, it was said that the latter species does not absorb at 382 nm, which means that the extinction coefficient for [AuBr2]- will be zero.

The second separate experiment will allow you to know the extinction coefficient for the first species, namely, [AuBr4]-. In the first experiment, you can find the final concentration of this species after equilbrium has been reached. The difference will totally be from the second Au+-bearing species, as solid Au is not spectrometrically specific.
 
wow thanks
i got that exact same question on my lab manual too! :P
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top