Spectrum of the Hamiltonian in QFT

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the spectrum of the Hamiltonian in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and its implications for multiparticle states in Fock space. Participants explore the differences between quantum mechanics and QFT, particularly regarding the utility and existence of the Hamiltonian spectrum in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while the spectrum of the Hamiltonian in ordinary quantum mechanics provides significant information about the system, its application in QFT is less straightforward due to the nature of multiparticle states.
  • Another participant argues that there is nothing inherently wrong with the equation \(\hat H |\psi_{n}\rangle=E_{n}|\psi_{n}\rangle\) in QFT, but emphasizes that it is not particularly useful for interacting states, which do not remain stationary.
  • A question is raised about the term "mass sheet," with a suggestion that it may refer to "mass shell," and a request for clarification on the importance of determining the spectrum of \(m^{2}\).
  • Further elaboration is provided on the challenges of defining the Hamiltonian in relativistic QFTs, particularly in QED, where the existence of a well-defined theory in 3+1 dimensions is questioned.
  • One participant references Arnold Neumaier's FAQ as a resource for understanding the complexities of QED, describing it as a set of rules for a divergent perturbation expansion rather than a complete theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the utility of the Hamiltonian spectrum in QFT, with some suggesting it can be useful in specific cases while others argue that its application is limited, particularly for interacting states. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence and definition of the Hamiltonian in relativistic QFTs.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the current understanding of the Hamiltonian in QFT, particularly concerning the existence of a well-defined theory in certain dimensions and the challenges posed by interacting states.

unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I know in ordinary QM, the spectrum of the Hamiltonian \{ E_{n}\} gives you just about everything you need for the system in question (roughly speaking). So what happens to this spectrum in QFT where |\psi\rangle is now a multiparticle wavefunction in some Fock space? I've been trying to understand this, but I don't yet have a clear grasp. Essentially, what's wrong with writing \hat H |\psi_{n}\rangle=E_{n}|\psi_{n}\rangle in QFT where the psi's are now multiparticle states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's nothing wrong, but it's not really useful. The QFT has two types of states: free / asymptotic ones for which the spectral equation for the Hamiltonian has solutions - free particles on their mass sheet (according to the representations of SL(2,C) semidirect product with R^4), while for the interacting states there's no use for the spectral equation, since the states are no longer stationary -> S-matrix formalism.
 
What's a mass sheet? (Or did you mean mass shell?) Also, I read elsewhere that determining the spectrum corresponds to finding the spectrum of m^{2} or something, but I don't quite understand what that means or why it's important.
 
unchained1978 said:
Essentially, what's wrong with writing \hat H |\psi_{n}\rangle=E_{n}|\psi_{n}\rangle in QFT where the psi's are now multiparticle states?

There is nothing wrong. In some favourable cases you can diagonalize the multiparticle hamiltonian and you get everything you want from it, like e.g. for the strong coupling hamiltonian in superconductors.
The problem with relativistic QFT's like QED is that in 3+1 dimensions no one even has shown that the QFT exists at all as a well defined theory and the hamiltonian is unknown.
 
DrDu said:
The problem with relativistic QFT's like QED is that in 3+1 dimensions no one even has shown that the QFT exists at all as a well defined theory and the hamiltonian is unknown.

Can you elaborate a bit please? Or provide some links? I don't quite understand what you mean here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K