Spectrum of the Hamiltonian in QFT

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the spectrum of the Hamiltonian in Quantum Field Theory (QFT), specifically addressing the challenges of applying traditional quantum mechanics concepts to multiparticle states in Fock space. It is established that while the spectral equation \(\hat H |\psi_{n}\rangle=E_{n}|\psi_{n}\rangle\) is valid, it is not useful for interacting states due to their non-stationary nature, necessitating the S-matrix formalism. The conversation highlights that for free particles, the Hamiltonian can be diagonalized, but for relativistic QFTs like Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) in 3+1 dimensions, the existence of a well-defined Hamiltonian remains unproven. The importance of determining the spectrum of \(m^{2}\) is also noted, although its implications are not fully understood by all participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics (QM) principles
  • Familiarity with Quantum Field Theory (QFT) concepts
  • Knowledge of Fock space and multiparticle states
  • Basic grasp of the S-matrix formalism
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the S-matrix formalism in QFT
  • Study the concept of mass shell and its relevance in particle physics
  • Explore the challenges of defining Hamiltonians in relativistic QFTs
  • Investigate Arnold Neumaier's FAQ on Hilbert spaces and QFT
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I know in ordinary QM, the spectrum of the Hamiltonian \{ E_{n}\} gives you just about everything you need for the system in question (roughly speaking). So what happens to this spectrum in QFT where |\psi\rangle is now a multiparticle wavefunction in some Fock space? I've been trying to understand this, but I don't yet have a clear grasp. Essentially, what's wrong with writing \hat H |\psi_{n}\rangle=E_{n}|\psi_{n}\rangle in QFT where the psi's are now multiparticle states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's nothing wrong, but it's not really useful. The QFT has two types of states: free / asymptotic ones for which the spectral equation for the Hamiltonian has solutions - free particles on their mass sheet (according to the representations of SL(2,C) semidirect product with R^4), while for the interacting states there's no use for the spectral equation, since the states are no longer stationary -> S-matrix formalism.
 
What's a mass sheet? (Or did you mean mass shell?) Also, I read elsewhere that determining the spectrum corresponds to finding the spectrum of m^{2} or something, but I don't quite understand what that means or why it's important.
 
unchained1978 said:
Essentially, what's wrong with writing \hat H |\psi_{n}\rangle=E_{n}|\psi_{n}\rangle in QFT where the psi's are now multiparticle states?

There is nothing wrong. In some favourable cases you can diagonalize the multiparticle hamiltonian and you get everything you want from it, like e.g. for the strong coupling hamiltonian in superconductors.
The problem with relativistic QFT's like QED is that in 3+1 dimensions no one even has shown that the QFT exists at all as a well defined theory and the hamiltonian is unknown.
 
DrDu said:
The problem with relativistic QFT's like QED is that in 3+1 dimensions no one even has shown that the QFT exists at all as a well defined theory and the hamiltonian is unknown.

Can you elaborate a bit please? Or provide some links? I don't quite understand what you mean here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K