Speed of a 50.0 kg Box Pulled by 1.50 * 10^2 N Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter punjabi_monster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Force Speed
AI Thread Summary
A 1.50 * 10^2 N force is pulling a 50.0 kg box at a 25.0° angle on a horizontal surface, with a coefficient of friction of 0.250. The initial calculations incorrectly assumed the entire force contributed to overcoming friction and moving the box. To find the correct speed, the applied force must be resolved into horizontal and vertical components, and the frictional force calculated accordingly. The work done against friction and the net work done on the box must be accurately accounted for to determine the final speed. The correct final speed, after adjustments, is 2.53 m/s.
punjabi_monster
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
A 1.50 * 10^2 N force is pulling a 50.0 kg box along a horizontal surface. The force acts at an angle of 25.0°. If this force acts through a displacement of 12.0 m, and the coefficient of friction in 0.250, what is the speed of the box, assuming it started from rest?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What have you done so far?
 
this is how i attempted to solve the question:

Fg=mg
=(50kg)(-9.81m/s2)
= -491 N

Fnet=Fn-Fg
Fn= 491 N

Ff=uFn
=(0.250)(491N)
=123 N

W=Ek
W=Fd
W=(123 N)(12.0 m)
W=1472 J

Ek=1/2mv2
V=squareroot 2Ek/m
V=squareroot 2(1472 J)/(50.0 kg)
V= 7.7 m/s

The actual answer is 2.53 m/s. Can you tell me what i am doing wrong, thanks.
 
You have not accounted for the angle anywhere.
Resolve the applied force into its horizontal and vertical component.

-- AI
 
Ffriction=mu * Fn * cos (angle) -- this is the force due to friction, acting in opposite direction to pull

( pull <-- object --> Ffriction)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top