Speed of a comet around the sun.

AI Thread Summary
A comet in an elliptical orbit around the Sun has a closest approach distance of 4.5e10 m and a speed of 9.6e4 m/s. To determine its speed at a distance of 6e12 m, which is approximately the distance of Pluto, one can apply the principles of energy conservation. Although the mass of the comet is not provided, it can be factored out since it cancels in the calculations. The problem can be approached by using potential energy concepts, similar to calculating the speed of a thrown ball at a certain height. Understanding these energy relationships is key to solving the problem effectively.
Overseer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A comet is in an elliptical orbit around the Sun. Its closest approach to the Sun is a distance of 4.5e10 m (inside the orbit of Mercury), at which point its speed is 9.6e4 m/s. Its farthest distance from the Sun is far beyond the orbit of Pluto. What is its speed when it is 6e12 m from the Sun? (This is the approximate distance of Pluto from the Sun.)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to start with this. All I'm told is its speed at the "bottom" of its orbit, and then I'm told to calculate its speed at the "top" of it orbit. I am not given the mass of the comet so I can't find it's Potential or Kinetic Energy which is what this section is over. To my knowledge there is no direct relationship between distance in an orbit and a bodies speed. Perhaps I'm overlooking something brutally obvious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you need to use potential energy. because you know its speed at a certain distance, mass becomes a common factor and you no longer need it. So you have the speed at a certain distance, and you need to find its speed at a further distance.

analogy:

a ball of mass m is thrown into the air and has an instantaneous speed right before it hits the ground of 35 metres per second. What is its speed when it is a distance of 15 metres from the ground.

You can use energy to find this answer, and it is exactly the same concept. good luck
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top