Speed of a moving object, according to another moving object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of one moving object as observed from another moving object within the framework of special relativity. The participants analyze the velocities of two objects, #1 and #2, which are moving at angles relative to each other in a lab frame. They explore the use of Lorentz transformations and the need to consider both x and y components of velocity when switching frames. There is confusion regarding the correct application of the transformation equations, particularly in relation to the angles and the separation of components. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of properly transforming the worldlines and velocities rather than treating components independently.
Phantoful
Messages
30
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Special Relativity Question.

Consider objects 1 and 2 moving in the lab frame; they both start at the origin, and #1 moves with a speed u and #2 moves with a speed v. They both move in straight lines, with an angle θ between their trajectories (again in the lab frame). What is #1's speed as viewed by #2?

crFYNA6.png

Homework Equations



x' = γ(x-vt)
t' = γ(t-(vx/c2))
u' = (u±v)/(1±(uv/c2))
Length Contractions
Lorentz Transformations
[/B]
Where γ = 1/((1-(v2/c2))),
v is the velocity of the frame S' relative to S,
and u' is the velocity of some object in the new frame S'.
(These are general equations, not variables from the question).

The Attempt at a Solution


So I assumed the lab frame (I'll call it S) was at rest, and I had #2's (Flash) velocity along the x-axis, and #1's (Superman) velocity at some angle θ1 above that, both starting from the origin. To simplify things, I made another frame S' where the new Vframe=v, so in this new frame object 2's speed is v' = 0, and u' is what we're looking for I think.

In the j direction, nothing would change in S' for object 1, and the velocity in the i direction would be less so the angle would change, as well as the magnitude from that, so we now have θ2. However, I'm not really sure how I would use this new angle. From using the u' equation I have above, I got:

u'x = (u*cos(θ1) - v) / (1 - (u*cos(θ1)*v / (c2)))

(Would this be 1+ uc/c^2 or 1- uv/c^2 in the denominator? I'm not sure how to tell)

u'y = (u*sin(θ1) - 0) / (1 - 0)

I got 1 - 0 because the V of the frame in the j direction is 0

However none of that really took into account θ2, and I'm not sure how to get my final answer with the x and y components. With relativity can I just do the Pythagorean theorem as normal?
 

Attachments

  • crFYNA6.png
    crFYNA6.png
    10.6 KB · Views: 434
Physics news on Phys.org
Phantoful said:
In the j direction, nothing would change in S' for object 1,
This is not correct. You need to think more about this.

Phantoful said:
From using the u' equation I have above, I got:

u'x = (u*cos(θ1) - v) / (1 - (u*cos(θ1)*v / (c2)))
This is not correct either. You cannot treat the components separately. You need to Lorentz transform the worldline of 1 to S’ and identify tge corresponding velocity. Alternatively you can use 4-vectors if you are familiar with them.
 
  • Like
Likes Phantoful
Orodruin said:
Phantoful said:
u'x = (u*cos(θ1) - v) / (1 - (u*cos(θ1)*v / (c2)))
This is not correct either.
I’m hesitant to go against you, but I’m pretty sure that part is correct, isn’t it?

Anyway @Phantoful the y component is definitely not the same when changing frames. (A boost along the x-direction leave y-displacements unchanged, not y-velocities.)

Try considering two events located on superman that are Δt apart in the lab frame. What is Δx and Δy in the lab frame? What is Δt’, Δx’, Δy’ between these events in Flash’s frame?
 
  • Like
Likes Phantoful
Nathanael said:
I’m hesitant to go against you, but I’m pretty sure that part is correct, isn’t it?

Yes, you are correct. I blame lack of sleep last night. :rolleyes: Don't hesitate to point out when I screw up.
 
  • Like
Likes Phantoful
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top