What Is the Speed of a Wave If a Jetskier Moves at 8.30 m/s?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypnos_16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of waves when a jetskier moves at 8.30 m/s in the same direction as the waves. The bump frequency experienced by the skier is 1.17 Hz, and the distance between wave crests is 5.30 m. The initial attempt to calculate wave speed using the equation v = (wavelength)ƒ resulted in an incorrect value of 6.201 m/s. The correct approach involves considering the relative velocity of the skier to the waves, leading to the conclusion that the wave speed must account for both the skier's speed and the bump frequency. Understanding the relationship between the skier's motion and wave propagation is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Hypnos_16
Messages
148
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A jetskier is moving at 8.30 m/s in the direction in which the waves on a lake are moving. Each time he passes over a crest, he feels a bump. The bumping frequency is 1.17 Hz, and the crests are separated by 5.30 m. What is the wave speed?

Jetski's Speed = 8.30m/s with the waves
ƒ of waves= 1.17
wavelength = 5.30m

Homework Equations



v = (wavelength)ƒ

The Attempt at a Solution



when i tried the equation above i got an answer of 6.201m/s which turned out to now be right. What am i missing here?

v = ƒ(wavelength)
v = (1.17)(5.30)
v = (6.201m/s)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The waves are moving forward at the same time that the boat is, so the frequency of the bumps that the skier feels is not the frequency of the wave.

I suggest that you draw a diagram showing a wave at some starting time (zero is a good number), with the jetski at a wavecrest. The jetski will hit the following wavecrest at a time consistent with the given bump frequency. So, draw another wave below the first but shifted over to reflect that the wave has moved during that time interval. See if you can't work out the wave speed from there.
 
It is easy to solve this problem by using the relative velocity of the skier with respect to the waves. If the velocity of the waves is V, the relative velocity of the skier is 8.3-V (m/s), as they move in the same direction. You can imagine a standing wave pattern with crests 5.30 m apart. The skier travels this distance with its relative velocity in 1/f time (f is the frequency of the bumps). Just use the relation "distance = speed times time".

ehild
 
ehild said:
It is easy to solve this problem by using the relative velocity of the skier with respect to the waves. If the velocity of the waves is V, the relative velocity of the skier is 8.3-V (m/s), as they move in the same direction. You can imagine a standing wave pattern with crests 5.30 m apart. The skier travels this distance with its relative velocity in 1/f time (f is the frequency of the bumps). Just use the relation "distance = speed times time".

ehild

Why would it be 8.3 - V if they go in the same direction? wouldn't they add up? Also how does the skier have two relative velocities? (8.3 - v) and (1 / ƒ)
I'm still not getting it.
 
Imagine you sit on a train and another train travels beside you with the same velocity Does it seem moving at all?

The skier moves with velocity v(rel)=8.3-v during a time interval T=1/f. The distance traveled is 5.3 m.

ehild
 
Okay, yeah that makes sense now, i don't know how that didn't click before, thanks for your help man.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...

Similar threads

Back
Top