Speed of Glider After Compressing Spring 0.14m

  • Thread starter Thread starter bearhug
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compressed Spring
AI Thread Summary
A glider with a mass of 0.13 kg is attached to a spring with a force constant of 9.1 N/m, compressed by 0.14 m before being released. The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of the glider after it has moved 0.25 m from its starting point. To find the speed, the change in potential energy of the spring must be equated to the kinetic energy of the glider. The potential energy is calculated using the formula W = 1/2kx^2, and it is clarified that the glider's movement beyond the spring means all potential energy converts to kinetic energy. The key point is that the entire potential energy from the spring is now the kinetic energy of the glider.
bearhug
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A glider of mass 0.13 kg moves on a horizontal frictionless air track. It is permanently attached to one end of a massless horiztonal spring, which has a force constant of 9.1 N/m for both extension and compression. The other end of the spring is fixed. The glider is moved to compress the spring by 0.14 m and then released from rest. Calculate the speed of the glider at the point where it has moved 0.25 m from its starting point.
W=1/2kx^2
W=1/2(9.1)(0.11)^2
=0.055 J
Is this the right way to solve for W before solving for the speed? I wasn't sure if I needed to subtract .25-.14 or not. So far I've been getting the wrong answer and want to know where I'm going wrong.

The equation I use to find speed is W=1/2mvf^2-1/2mvi^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the kinetic energy of the glider you must find the change in potential energy of the spring;

W = \frac{1}{2}kx_{i}^{2} - \frac{1}{2}kx_{f}^{2}
 
bearhug said:
Is this the right way to solve for W before solving for the speed? I wasn't sure if I needed to subtract .25-.14 or not.
Not. the .25 m is there to inform you that the glider has moved beyond the spring entirely. The full amount of PE from the spring is now the KE of the glider (ideally speaking, of course).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top