Speed of Gravity: Is It As Fast As Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheMuses
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Speed
AI Thread Summary
Gravity propagates at the speed of light, meaning if the Sun were to suddenly disappear, it would take approximately 8 minutes for its gravitational influence to cease on Earth, just like the light. This aligns with the principles of general relativity, which state that gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation travel at the same speed in empty space. Other fundamental forces, such as the strong force, also propagate at light speed, while the weak force travels at slower speeds due to its massive carriers. Classical forces like elasticity and friction do not move objects at light speed, although their fields propagate at that speed. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that all fundamental forces have a maximum propagation speed equal to that of light in a vacuum.
TheMuses
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Since nothing can go faster then the speed of light, how about gravity? While the Earth is rotating around the sun, we are being influenced by its gravity and light. What if the Sun suddenly disappears? It would take somewhere around 8 minutes for people on Earth to finally realize that the Sun is gone... How about its gravity? The instant the Sun disappears, would we be slingshoted into outerspace or would we have to wait 8 minutes for that to happen too?

I'm guessing if that's the case... gravity is as fast as the speed of light.

And if that's true... is that true for ALL the forces? Do they all go at the speed of light?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
yes.

If the Sun dissappeared, it would take approx. 8 minutes for the light to stop and the sun's gravity to take no more effect.
 
So you are saying that gravity is as fast as light. Is this true for all the forces ex: magnetic, electromegnatic, attraction between charged particles, etc...?
 
- Yes, if the sun suddenly dissapears, we would only feel that after 8 minutes.
- Yes, gravitational waves propagate at the speed of light.
( More reading here: http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp )

What other "forces" might you be interested in? If you reffer to the remaining interactions:
- strong force propagates at light speed (as gluons are massless)
- weak force propagates at speeds below c (as the carriers have mass)

Classical "forces" (like elasticity, friction, etc) obviously don't make objects move at the speed of light, although the field propagates at the speed of light.

Those things you mentioned ( magnetic, electromegnatic, attraction between charged particles ) are actually just the same thing as light.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some pedantic caveats

TheMuses said:
Since nothing can go faster then the speed of light, how about gravity? While the Earth is rotating around the sun, we are being influenced by its gravity and light. What if the Sun suddenly disappears?

I'm guessing ... gravity is as fast as the speed of light.

1. According to gtr (and most related theories of gravitation), gravitational radiation and electromagnetic radiation move at the same speed (at least, in "empty space", i.e. region not filled with matter). In particular, in gtr one can study both gravitational and electromagnetic plane wave solutions, or plane waves combining both types of radiation, and in the latter case, the wavefronts of the gravitational and the EM radiation are the same.

2. Even in flat spacetime, there are many distinct but operationally significant notions of distance, and thus of velocity, over noninfinitesimal regions. For this reason, you should speak of the "infinitesimal speed" or some such phrase signalling this caveat.

3. In gtr, the principle of conservation of mass-energy prevents one from studying a scenario in which the Sun simply "vanishes". One can however study a scenario which which an isolated object suddenly and asymmetrically redistributes its matter (e.g. an exploding bomb in deep space). In such a case, we would expect the explosion to produce both gravitational and electromagnetic radiation, and the wavefronts would expand at the same speed.

Arian said:
If the Sun dissappeared, it would take approx. 8 minutes for the light to stop and the sun's gravity to take no more effect.

Which should be understood as shorthand for: if our Sun exploded, it would take 8 minutes for the bad news to reach us. (As a practical concern, the EM radiation would be far more dangerous than any gravitational radiation. But while the Sun is expected to eventually misbehave badly, this is not expected to happen for some billions of years, and the expected scenario would initially pose problems for life on Earth rather different from what one might guess from this "eight minute scenario".)
 
That's what the difference between einstein's gravity and Newtonion's gravity,the latter one was somewhat unable to explain this.u can imagine ripples of space time warp being disappearing first from center and then ripples travel in the form of gravitational waves which reach us by 8 min.

I had my first general theory of relativity class started by this same question(if the sun disappears suddenly) and luckily i knew the answer.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top