Speed of Light: Path in Gravity Well & Denser Medium

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
The path of light in a known medium in a gravity well is x, is the path of the light still x in
a dencer medium ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since light's path can be bent when it travels through a medium in ordinary flat spacetime (see here and here), the answer must be "no". But it would depend on the index of refraction, not the density.
 
JesseM said:
Since light's path can be bent when it travels through a medium in ordinary flat spacetime (see here and here), the answer must be "no". But it would depend on the index of refraction, not the density.

Doesn't the deviation of the light's path also depend on the local variation of the medium's density ? Just like in the case of dispersion (ie "white" light splits up into different frequencies when it passes through a medium)?

Or what about absorption of photons by the medium's atoms and the subsequent emission into "other" directions than the incident direction.

My point is, shouldn't we tackle this question from a QM point of view ?

regards
marlon

ps : i do realize that mentioning QM in this subthread is a bit, err, contradictory, but anyhow, what are your thoughts on this ?
 
Last edited:
marlon said:
Doesn't the deviation of the light's path also depend on the local variation of the medium's density ? Just like in the case of dispersion (ie "white" light splits up into different frequencies when it passes through a medium)?
Well, when I said it would depend on the index of refraction rather than the density, I didn't mean to rule out the idea that the density of the medium could itself influence the index of refraction, it's just that other things would presumably influence it too. I don't know enough to say what physical properties of a medium determine the refraction index, I think you're right that you'd need to get into QM to understand it.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
359
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
683
Back
Top