Speed of Point on Rim of 50.0 g Disk with 8.00 cm Diameter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a point on the rim of a rotating disk with a given mass and diameter. The initial approach involved using the kinetic rotational energy formula and the moment of inertia for a solid disk, but the user initially miscalculated the angular speed (ω). After realizing the problem specifically asked for linear speed rather than angular speed, the user correctly applied the formula v = rω to find the speed at the rim. The final correct speed calculated was 3.9 m/s. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between linear and angular measurements in rotational dynamics.
tangibleLime
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin, 50.0 g disk with a diameter of 8.00 cm rotates about an axis through its center with 0.190 J of kinetic energy. What is the speed of a point on the rim?

Homework Equations


C = \frac{1}{2}MR^2
K_{rot}=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the formula for kinetic rotational energy is K_{rot}=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2, and the constant for the moment of inertia for a solid disk with the axis of rotation about it's diameter is C = \frac{1}{2}MR^2, I substituted the I in the second equation with the first equation, resulting in the following:

K_{rot}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}MR^2)\omega^2

Substituting the values that I was supplied with in the problem statement, I came up with this equation:

0.190=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}(0.05)(0.04)^2)\omega^2

Solving for \omega, I ended up with \omega \approx \pm 97.5, which was determined to be incorrect.

Any help would be extremely appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It asks for the SPEED of a point on the rim. It does not ask for the angular speed.
 
I figured it was something like that, so shortly after posting the initial topic, I tried v=r\omega as v=(0.04)(97.5) which results in the correct answer of 3.9. Originally I received an answer that was something like 360 (I must have entered a wrong number or something into the calculator) so I ignored it. Then after you posted and backed up my thoughts, I tried again and got the correct answer. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top