Speed of sound through a plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formulas for calculating the transverse and longitudinal velocities of sound through a rectangular plate. The key formulas provided are: Longitudinal velocity = sqrt(E/(rho*(1-nu^2))) and Transverse (Bending) velocity = ((2*pi*f)^2*B/rho/h)^(1/4), where E is Young's Modulus, rho is density, nu is Poisson's ratio, f is frequency, and B is bending stiffness. The context for these calculations is to determine sound transmission loss through the plate. Participants express confusion regarding the application of these formulas, particularly for transverse wave velocity. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding how to apply these equations effectively.
saurabh_2110
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Speed of sound through a plate!

Hi,

I wanted to know the formula for the transverse velocity and longitudinal velocity of sound through a rectangular plate.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!..

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


saurabh_2110 said:
Hi,

I wanted to know the formula for the transverse velocity and longitudinal velocity of sound through a rectangular plate.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!..

Thanks

What is the context? And what do you mean by transverse and longitudinal velocity?
 


What is the plate made of? Seems like you're looking for numbers, not formulas.
 


Well the plate could be made of any material. It would use the Young's modulus, poisson's ratio and density. I have some formulas but I am not sure about them

Longitudnal = sqrt(E/(rho*(1-nu^2)))
Transverse (Bending) = ((2*pi*f)^2*B/rho/h)^(1/4)

where, E = Young's Modulus,
rho = density;
nu = poisson's ratio
f = frequency
B = Bending stiffness of plate

The context is that, I need these velocities to find sound transmission loss through a plate. These formulas weren't stated very explicitly, so I'm not quite sure...
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
 


saurabh_2110 said:
Well the plate could be made of any material. It would use the Young's modulus, poisson's ratio and density. I have some formulas but I am not sure about them

Longitudnal = sqrt(E/(rho*(1-nu^2)))
Transverse (Bending) = ((2*pi*f)^2*B/rho/h)^(1/4)

where, E = Young's Modulus,
rho = density;
nu = poisson's ratio
f = frequency
B = Bending stiffness of plate

The context is that, I need these velocities to find sound transmission loss through a plate. These formulas weren't stated very explicitly, so I'm not quite sure...
Any help will be greatly appreciated!

I googled speed of sound in solids, and got some pretty good hits. Check out the hit list to see if these are any help:

http://www.google.com/search?source...LL_enUS301US302&q=velocity+of+sound+in+solids

.
 


Thanks berkeman...but most of this is with reference to longitudinal velocity. The usual way is to divide the bulk modulus by the density and then take its square root...
But for the transverse or bending wave velocity??..Im still a little confused...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top