Calculate Speed of a Stone Thrown Vertically Upward

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hyperreality
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed of a stone thrown vertically upward, the problem involves two points: point A with speed v and point B, 3.00 m higher, with speed 1/2 v. The equations of motion are applied, specifically v^2 = u^2 - 2gd and v^2/4 = u^2 - 2g(d+3). The calculations lead to the conclusion that the correct relationship should yield (3v^2)/4 = 6g, which indicates an error in the initial approach. The expected answer is 8.85 m/s, suggesting a miscalculation in the interpretation of the equations. Correct application of the equations and careful attention to the values will resolve the discrepancy.
Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
A stone is thrown vertically upward. On its way up it passes point A with speed v , and point B, 3.00 m higher than A, with speed 1/2 v . Calculate the speed v
Here is how I tackled this problem. Let v = final velocity, and u = initial velocity.

v^2 = u^2 - 2gd eq.1

v^2/4 = u^2 - 2g(d+3) eq.2

Rearrange eq. 2 to obtain
v^2 = 4u^2 - 8gd - 24

Solve u
4u^2 - 8gd - 24 = u^2 - 2gd

3u^2 = 6gd + 24

u^2 = 2gd + 8

v^2 = 2gd + 8 - 2gd
= 8
v = 2 [squ] 2 ms^-1

But the book says the answer is 8.85 ms^-1. So what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There' only one equation.

When the stone passes point A, that's position "zero" with initial velocity "v". At point B, the displacement is now 3 m and final velocity is "v/2." You chose the right equation. Along the way to the answer you shoul get "(3v^2)/4 = 6g "
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top