Sphere falling in countercurrent liquid flow

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a sphere falling through a liquid with an upward countercurrent flow. The original equation for velocity in stagnant flow is provided, but the user seeks to adapt it for countercurrent conditions. It is clarified that the terminal velocity of the sphere can indeed be found by subtracting the countercurrent velocity from the terminal velocity in stagnant flow. The user also questions whether to apply momentum to the projected area or half the total surface area of the sphere. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a proper understanding of fluid dynamics to accurately model the scenario.
Bakery87
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm attempting to find the velocity of a sphere falling through a liquid with an upward countercurrent flow. I already have the velocity as a function of time in a stagnant flow regime, but do not have one with countercurrent flow.

Here is the equation without countercurrent flow:
v(t) = [(p_s - p_f)*V*g/b]*[1-exp(-b*t/m)]

where:
p_s = density of sphere
p_f = density of fluid
V = volume of sphere
g = 9.8 m/s^2
t = time
m = mass of sphere
b = 6(Pi)(fluid viscosity)(sphere radius)

The information can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viscous_resistance
(under very low reynold's number - stokes drag)

I know the stokes drag will work for reynolds numbers under 1, which may not be the case.

The addition of a countercurrent flow I assume cannot be added by simply finding the terminal velocity of a falling sphere and then subtracting the countercurrent velocity. I assumed a force balance on the system by subtracting the momentum of the fluid (before the derivation to the above) but the equation doesn't seem to properly identify the velocity. I also wasn't sure if the momentum needed to be applied to the projected area of the sphere (Pi*r^2) or half the total surface area (2*Pi*r^2).

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bakery87 said:
I'm attempting to find the velocity of a sphere falling through a liquid with an upward countercurrent flow. I already have the velocity as a function of time in a stagnant flow regime, but do not have one with countercurrent flow.

Here is the equation without countercurrent flow:
v(t) = [(p_s - p_f)*V*g/b]*[1-exp(-b*t/m)]

where:
p_s = density of sphere
p_f = density of fluid
V = volume of sphere
g = 9.8 m/s^2
t = time
m = mass of sphere
b = 6(Pi)(fluid viscosity)(sphere radius)

The information can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viscous_resistance
(under very low reynold's number - stokes drag)

I know the stokes drag will work for reynolds numbers under 1, which may not be the case.

The addition of a countercurrent flow I assume cannot be added by simply finding the terminal velocity of a falling sphere and then subtracting the countercurrent velocity.
Wrong. That's exactly what can be done.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top