Spherical capacitor with 2 dielectrics.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a spherical capacitor with two concentric dielectrics. The standard approach involves using the spherical capacitance formula and treating the two dielectrics as capacitors in series. An alternative method was attempted by calculating the electric field and voltage through integrals, which initially led to confusion regarding the results. Ultimately, the calculations were verified to be correct, confirming that the voltage expression derived was valid. The conversation emphasizes the importance of simplifying results to avoid misinterpretation.
Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


The problem is on page 40 of this PDF:
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/visualizations/coursenotes/modules/guide05.pdf
Find the capacitance of a spherical capacitor with 2 different homogeneous dielectrics arranged concentrically.

The Attempt at a Solution



In that document they simply apply the spherical capacitance formula and get the expressions for two capacitors, the inner and outer sphere, then they add their inverses as its pretty much 2 capacitors in series.

I've been trying to solve the problem "my way" by starting straight from the fact that E is the field for a sphere of charge, and calculate the voltage: circulation integral from the surface of the inner terminal to the outer shell/terminal.

So I have to add the following integrals

V = \int^a_b Q/4\pi\epsilon_1r^2\,dr + \int^b_c Q/4\pi\epsilon_2r^2\,dr

Is this correct? Because if I do the math/LCM and divide Q by it etc, my expression for the capacitance differs. Am I assuming something invalid with my integral? I know E should be constant between the cap terminals, but the field lines circulate through 2 different dielectrics so I thought splitting up the integral was reasonable.

EDIT: OOPS nevermind, lack of simplifying my answer made me think it was wrong when I had arrived to the same answer as that pdf.

Just want to make sure in case though, did I calculate V correctly?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top