Spherical capacitor with 2 dielectrics.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a spherical capacitor with two different homogeneous dielectrics arranged concentrically. The standard approach involves applying the spherical capacitance formula and treating the two dielectrics as capacitors in series. The user initially attempted to derive the voltage using electric field integrals but later confirmed that their calculations aligned with the established method presented in the referenced MIT document. The final conclusion is that the voltage calculation for the spherical capacitor is correct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical capacitance formula
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts in dielectrics
  • Familiarity with integral calculus for voltage calculations
  • Basic principles of capacitors in series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the spherical capacitance formula in detail
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields in different dielectrics
  • Explore advanced integral calculus techniques for electric potential calculations
  • Research the implications of capacitors in series on overall capacitance
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone studying capacitor design and behavior in systems with multiple dielectrics.

Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


The problem is on page 40 of this PDF:
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/visualizations/coursenotes/modules/guide05.pdf
Find the capacitance of a spherical capacitor with 2 different homogeneous dielectrics arranged concentrically.

The Attempt at a Solution



In that document they simply apply the spherical capacitance formula and get the expressions for two capacitors, the inner and outer sphere, then they add their inverses as its pretty much 2 capacitors in series.

I've been trying to solve the problem "my way" by starting straight from the fact that E is the field for a sphere of charge, and calculate the voltage: circulation integral from the surface of the inner terminal to the outer shell/terminal.

So I have to add the following integrals

[itex]V = \int^a_b Q/4\pi\epsilon_1r^2\,dr + \int^b_c Q/4\pi\epsilon_2r^2\,dr[/itex]

Is this correct? Because if I do the math/LCM and divide Q by it etc, my expression for the capacitance differs. Am I assuming something invalid with my integral? I know E should be constant between the cap terminals, but the field lines circulate through 2 different dielectrics so I thought splitting up the integral was reasonable.

EDIT: OOPS nevermind, lack of simplifying my answer made me think it was wrong when I had arrived to the same answer as that pdf.

Just want to make sure in case though, did I calculate V correctly?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K