Spin Angular Momentum matrix of an antineutrino

askankur
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I m preparing for a competitive exam and this is one of the questions of last years exam -

Q Write down the y-component of Spin Angular Momentum matrix corresponding to an Antineutrino.


My approach is to apply Sy operator on the spin wave function of antineutrino. But how to find out the spin wave function for antineutrino. It will have the form of [\alpha\chi1/2+\beta\chi-1/2]. How do I find out \alpha and \beta ... OR are there any fix values of them for antineutrino ?

Please suggest me how to solve this question. Is my approach correct or am I on wrong lines ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the answer is just {1\over2}\sigma_y. You really aren't given enough info to say any more than say this.

I believe this question is testing two things: (1) What is the spin of the antineutrino? (Answer: one half.) (2) What are the components of the angular-momentum operator for this spin? (Answer: one-half times the Pauli matrices.)

Since this was last year's exam, you should be able to find out what the correct answer was considered to be.
 
Thank you for replying to my query ! This is a subjective exam and answers to the questions are never declared officially .. so there is no reference to check the probable answer !

But your answer makes perfect sense to me ... much information is not given in the question. Just one more query - you said answer should be "half times Pauli matrices" .. shouldn't it be "half times Spin Operator Sy" i.e. Pauli's matix should be also multiplied by 'h-cross/2' ? Also it should not half times rather it should be the Sy operator on the state showing the half spin i.e. |+1/2>

The correct answer it seems to me will be Sy|+1/2>

Please comment !
 
Last edited:
Yes, I should have said hbar times one-half times the Pauli matrices. (I am used to setting hbar = 1).

I think you have to say what S_y *is*. And there is no reason to assume that the spin of the antineutrino is +1/2 along any particular axis, so I don't think the state should be there.
 
Basically Sy = (hbar/2)*sigmay ... that's why I asked that the solution should be multiplied by hbar/2

Yes there is no reason to assume that spin state will be +1/2 ... but then - will the y-component be independent of what the 'spin state' of the particle is ? i.e. it will always simply be Sy matrix ? .. Sy is simply an operator that needs to be operated on some spin wave function to find out the y-component .. isn't it ? But I guess the information given here is not sufficient to find out the spin state of the particle ! .. correct me if I m wrong !

So I think when he says the 'y-component' in the question .. he is asking the operator needed to find the y-component !

On a side note, somehow I am not able to use latex notations ... everytime I write something it jst shows alpha symbol only. I m new to this forum so may be I m missing something !
 
Last edited:
The problem is finally solved .. I got reference from some textbook which says that Sy is the component of spin angular momentum matrix !

So answer is simply Sy

I really appreciate your help in this regard :)
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
464
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top