- #1

- 19

- 0

Quick question, do bigger planet spin faster?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter valdar
- Start date

- #1

- 19

- 0

Quick question, do bigger planet spin faster?

- #2

- 2,486

- 103

Look up the data.

- #3

Nabeshin

Science Advisor

- 2,207

- 16

Quick question, do bigger planet spin faster?

In general, I don't think there's any relation.

- #4

Chronos

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 11,429

- 746

You must look at planet formation to understand this issue. The short answer is yes.

- #5

- 49

- 0

- #6

mgb_phys

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 7,819

- 15

Mercury 10.9

Venus 6.5

Earth 1670

Mars 867

Jupiter 45600

Saturn 37000

Uranus 10900

Neptune 8460

Pluto 47

You would expect small planets to spin faster - from conservation of angular momentum

But larger planets were formed from larger clouds of stuff.

As stuff contracted, then because of conservation of angular momentum it speeded up, the bigger/faster the original cloud the faster it ended up. Of course if you took the existing planets and made each of them smaller - they would speed up even more.

Then there are effects that have happened since. Mercury's rotation is slowed by tidal friction with the sun so has a very slow speed (long day), the Earth's is slowed a little by friction with the moon.

Uranus probably got hit by something in the past - which is why it has a weird axis tilt.

Mars might also have been affected by whatever caused the asteroid belt.

- #7

- 49

- 0

Mercury 10.9

Venus 6.5

Earth 1670

Mars 867

Jupiter 45600

Saturn 37000

Uranus 10900

Neptune 8460

Pluto 47

You would expect small planets to spin faster - from conservation of angular momentum

But larger planets were formed from larger clouds of stuff.

As stuff contracted, then because of conservation of angular momentum it speeded up, the bigger/faster the original cloud the faster it ended up. Of course if you took the existing planets and made each of them smaller - they would speed up even more.

Then there are effects that have happened since. Mercury's rotation is slowed by tidal friction with the sun so has a very slow speed (long day), the Earth's is slowed a little by friction with the moon.

Uranus probably got hit by something in the past - which is why it has a weird axis tilt.

Mars might also have been affected by whatever caused the asteroid belt.

Very interesting. Thank you for providing this

- #8

stevebd1

Gold Member

- 749

- 41

A good way of comparing spin in stars is to compare angular momentum and mass in geometric units where-

[tex]a=J/mc[/tex]

[tex]M=Gm/c^2[/tex]

where

[tex]J=vmr\,k[/tex]

where [itex]a[/itex] is the spin parameter in metres, v is the equatorial rotation velocity, m is mass, r is the equatorial radius and k is the moment of inertia coefficient (0.4 for an idealized sphere of uniform density).

a/M produces a unitless figure between 0 and 1, the higher the number, the higher the spin. For the Sun (k=0.06), a/M=~0.188, for a 2.2 sol neutron star with a frequency of 1500 Hz (k=0.35), a/M=~0.488.

This doesn't appear so straightforward with planets as M works out considerably smaller than [itex]a[/itex] but there should still be a way of comparing spin geometrically.

EDIT:

In the case of planets, you could probably get away with just considering the results of [itex]a[/itex] which is considered to be the amount of angular momentum per unit of mass (sometimes expressed as J/M). In this case, Jupiter is the clear winner and Mercury has the least 'spin' per unit of mass.

[tex]a=J/mc[/tex]

[tex]M=Gm/c^2[/tex]

where

[tex]J=vmr\,k[/tex]

where [itex]a[/itex] is the spin parameter in metres, v is the equatorial rotation velocity, m is mass, r is the equatorial radius and k is the moment of inertia coefficient (0.4 for an idealized sphere of uniform density).

a/M produces a unitless figure between 0 and 1, the higher the number, the higher the spin. For the Sun (k=0.06), a/M=~0.188, for a 2.2 sol neutron star with a frequency of 1500 Hz (k=0.35), a/M=~0.488.

This doesn't appear so straightforward with planets as M works out considerably smaller than [itex]a[/itex] but there should still be a way of comparing spin geometrically.

EDIT:

In the case of planets, you could probably get away with just considering the results of [itex]a[/itex] which is considered to be the amount of angular momentum per unit of mass (sometimes expressed as J/M). In this case, Jupiter is the clear winner and Mercury has the least 'spin' per unit of mass.

Last edited:

Share:

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 5K