Spin Tops: Why Do They React 90° Later?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rockazella
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of precession, where spinning tops react to external forces at a 90-degree angle from the direction of the applied force. This behavior is attributed to the axis of a rotating body moving perpendicularly to the force exerted. Understanding precession requires complex mathematical analysis, often involving vector analysis in three dimensions or even higher-dimensional mathematics. The conversation touches on the challenges of grasping these concepts without delving into intricate calculations. Overall, precession remains a fascinating topic that intertwines physics and mathematics.
Rockazella
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure what this behavior is technically called, but why do spinning tops (or anything else with some angular momentum) react to forces put on them 90 degrees later?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"90 degrees later" I can't understand.
I guess that the axis of rotating body moves in the direction perpendicular to the direction of the force exerted on the body. To analyze this problem, we need to calculate tedious equations of rotating solid body. I don't have time and patience enough to get the correct answer. Sorry!
 
It's called precession. It's hard to see how it works without math. Vector analysis in 3-D gives a sort of view of it, but to really get it you have to study six dimensional simplectic math.

Three things are mysteries, yea three things I know not: the way of particles when entangled, the way of the universe when accelerated and the way of a top when forced.
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Three things are mysteries, yea three things I know not: the way of particles when entangled, the way of the universe when accelerated and the way of a top when forced.

Is this a quote from anyone of consequence?

eNtRopY
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top