Understanding Spin Wavefunctions and the Confusion Surrounding Spin 3/2 States

barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
My lecturer writes:

The spin wavefunctions are symmetric on exchange of spins for the spin 3/2 states. These states include:

|\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \rangle

and |\uparrow \uparrow \downarrow \rangle + |\uparrow \downarrow \uparrow \rangle + |\downarrow \uparrow \uparrow \rangle

How is the second wavefunction a state for a spin 3/2 particle? I thought the spin is 1/2 + 1/2 - 1/2 = 1, so the measured spin can be 1, 0 or -1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with the spin 1 states that you get from adding two spin 1/2 particles and then add the third, standard excersice in QM

|++>

|+-> + |-+>

|-->

are the three spin 1 states you can build from adding two spin 1/2 particles-

The second state you wrote is the |S, S_z> = |3/2, 1> state
 
How are they spin 1 states though? How do you figure that out from those states?
 
barnflakes said:
How are they spin 1 states though? How do you figure that out from those states?

Have you done adding angular momenta in your QM class yet? yes or no?
 
We did it briefly, just in terms of quantum numbers though, so S = s1 + s2...|s1-s2|, we didn't relate it to the spin wavefunctions like the ones you have mentioned.
 
ok, there are three spin-1 states - do you agree?

do you also agree that |+-> + |-+> has S_z = 0?

and total spin

S^2 = (S_1 + S_2)^2 on that state gives s(s+1) = 1(1+1) = 2

as eigenvalue.

S^2 on |+-> + |-+> gives 0, right?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top