Spinning at the speed of light?

RunSwimSurf
Gold Member
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Actually I have a couple of questions. First of all, I'm new here so hello to everyone.

1) Is it possible for an object or something to rotate at the speed of light? For example, with a special record player, can a record spin at or near the speed of light or does c only refer to a straight path? Also, do the same rules apply meaning an infinite amount of energy is needed to accelerate the record to c?

2) Let's say that it is possible for a record to spin at light speed. If the inside and the outside of the record are traveling at the speed of light, but the outside of the record must travel a greater distance, then wouldn't the outside of the record be traveling faster than the speed of light? (I vaguely remember seeing this problem in a Calvin and Hobbes comic strip)

3) Since it's impossible to accelerate an object to the speed of light, is it possible for an object to exist which has always been faster than light? Another massless particle of some sort? Or does SR forbid this?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RunSwimSurf said:
1) Is it possible for an object or something to rotate at the speed of light? For example, with a special record player, can a record spin at or near the speed of light or does c only refer to a straight path? Also, do the same rules apply meaning an infinite amount of energy is needed to accelerate the record to c?
Yeah, it's impossible because it takes an infinite amount of energy to accelerate any massive object to c.
RunSwimSurf said:
3) Since it's impossible to accelerate an object to the speed of light, is it possible for an object to exist which has always been faster than light? Another massless particle of some sort? Or does SR forbid this?
SR doesn't really forbid it, such hypothetical particles are called "tachyons", see this article. But there's no evidence they exist, and if SR is correct any faster-than-light signalling would also open up the possibility of sending signals backwards in time for reasons relating to the relativity of simultaneity, so they'd cause problems with causality.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top