Spinning Penny: Why Does It Take Longer to Decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoAuSc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A spinning penny takes longer to come to a stop compared to a stationary penny due to its rotational kinetic energy and angular momentum. The rotational kinetic energy allows the penny to maintain motion longer, while the angular momentum creates torque that resists gravitational forces. As a result, the spinning penny vibrates faster and softer but decays more slowly. The dynamics of energy transformation between gravitational potential energy and rotational kinetic energy are key factors in this phenomenon. Understanding these principles highlights the complexities of motion and energy in spinning objects.
JoAuSc
Messages
197
Reaction score
1
Let's say you have a penny placed above a table at some angle. (I don't think it matters much whether the bottom of the penny is touching the table.) You let go, and you hear the penny bounce back and forth, quickly coming to a stop. However, if you do the same thing while trying to spin the penny, you hear it vibrate faster and softer, but it takes longer to decay to 0. Why does it take longer to decay if the penny's spinning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, a spinning penny has more energy, in the form of rotational kinetic energy, than one which is simply standing on it's rim, motionless, which simply has more gravitational potential energy than a penny lying flat on the table surface. The spinning penny also has angular momentum, which provides a torque, which resists the force of gravity.

See some examples of rotational kinetics here -
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vrox.html,
particularly http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/top.html
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top