Spivak Ch. 5 Limits, problem 6

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumP7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Spivak
QuantumP7
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose the functions f and g have the following property: for all ε > 0 and all x,

If 0 < \left| x-2 \right| < \sin^{2} \left( \frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{9} \right) + \varepsilon, then \left| f(x) - 2 \right| < \varepsilon.

If 0 < \left| x - 2 \right| < \varepsilon^{2} then \left| g(x) - 4 \right| < \varepsilon.

For each \varepsilon > 0 find a \delta > 0 such that for all x:


ii) if 0 < \left| x-2 \right| < \delta, then \left| f(x)g(x) - 8 \right| < \varepsilon.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



The solution book says:

We need: \left| f(x) - 2 \right| < min \left( 1, \frac{\varepsilon}{2 (\left| 4 \right| + 1)} \right) and \left| g(x) - 4 \right| < \frac{\varepsilon} {2 (\left| 2 \right|) + 1}.

My question is: How did they get these fractions in the solution? I've multiplied \left| f(x) - 2 \right| and \left| g(x) - 4 \right| to get \left| f(x)g(x) - 4f(x) - 2g(x) + 8 \right|. Am I going in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That g in the denominator in the first line is g(x)?
I would start by making some simplifying substitutions: u = x+2, F(u) = f(x)-2, G(u) = g(x)-4.
 
The denominator in the first line is 9, not g.
 
QuantumP7 said:
My question is: How did they get these fractions in the solution? I've multiplied \left| f(x) - 2 \right| and \left| g(x) - 4 \right| to get \left| f(x)g(x) - 4f(x) - 2g(x) + 8 \right|. Am I going in the right direction?
You'll have to do some more algebra to get it into a useful form. Here's a suggestion for how to start:
$$f(x)g(x) - 8 = (f(x) - 2)(g(x) - 4) + 4f(x) + 2g(x) - 16$$
Now see if you can do some more manipulations on the right hand side. You want to get more terms containing (f(x) - 2) and (g(x) - 4).
 
Thank you guys SO much!

jbunniii, that's exactly what I was looking for! Thank you!
 
A note for future visitors: the solution follows directly from part (2) of the lemma. No need for the algebraic manipulations.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top