Splitting Polynomials into Even and Odd Parts: A Unique Direct Sum Decomposition

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
1. Let \mathbb{R}[x]_n^+ and } \mathbb{R}[x]_n^- denote the vector subspaces of even and odd polynomials in \mathbb{R}[x]_n

Show \mathbb{R}[x]_n=\mathbb{R}[x]_n^+ \oplus\mathbb{R}[x]_n^-

3. For every p^+(x) \in \mathbb{R}[x]_n^+ \displaystyle p^+(x)=\sum_{m=0}^n a_m x^m=p^+(-x)

So a_m = 0 for m=2k+1, k=0,1,2,... else a_m \in \mathbb{R}. Similarly, a_m=0 for m=2k, k=0,1,2,... if the function is odd.

p^+(x)=a_0+a_2x^2+a_4x^4+\cdots, a_m\in\mathbb{R}

p^-(x)=a_1x+a_3x^3+a_5x^5+\cdots a_m\in\mathbb{R}

p(x)=a_0+a_2x^2+a_4x^4+\cdots+a_1x+a_3x^3+a_5x^5+\cdots for every p(x)\in \mathbb{R}[x]_n. So every p(x) is some p^+(x) with some p^-(x). Is this enough? Is it better to find a basis for the two subspaces and show that the union of the two basis sets spans \mathbb{R}[x]_n ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All that stuff about odd and even powers is true, but it's probably easiest to prove it if you use the projection operators p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2.
 
Say p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2. Then say that p(x)= p+(x)+p-(x) for all p(x) in R[x]_n?
 
Gregg said:
Say p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2. Then say that p(x)= p+(x)+p-(x) for all p(x) in R[x]_n?

Sure. That splits a polynomial into an even part and an odd part, which is exactly the power split you are talking about. Then I suppose you would want to show that the split is unique. That if p(x)=e(x)+o(x) where e(x) is even and o(x) is odd, then e(x)=p+(x) and o(x)=p-(x), right? Might depend on how exactly your definition of 'direct sum' is phrased.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top