Spontaneous Reactions and Molar Entropy

AI Thread Summary
The reaction A(g) --> B(g) is spontaneous under standard conditions, indicating that the reverse reaction B(g) --> A(g) is nonspontaneous. The discussion clarifies that the kinetics of the reaction do not determine spontaneity, which invalidates statement III. Additionally, statement II is also deemed false as it does not account for the equilibrium conditions described by the Gibbs equation. The highest standard molar entropy at 25°C is likely associated with the gas phase due to greater disorder. Overall, the focus is on understanding spontaneity and entropy in chemical reactions.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
The reaction A(g) --> B(g) is spontaneous under standard conditions. Which of the following statements must be true?

I. B(g) --> A(g) is nonspontaneous under standard conditions.
II. A(g) will be completely converted to B(g) if sufficient time is allowed.
III. A(g) will be completely converted to B(g) rapidly.



a. none of these
b. I
c. I and II
d. I, II, and III




The speed of the reaction, or kinetics, is not used to define a spontaneous reaction, so III doesn't fit. It is I because
I is the reverse reaction, but I am not fully certain of II.



Which substance will have the highest standard molar entropy at 25 C ?
a. C(graphite)
b. C2H4(g)
c. CH3OH(l)
d. MgCO3(s)

Is it the only one in gas form since it has the most disorder?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) II is also not true, can you tell me why? Think about the equilibrium Gibb's equation.

2)If it's a gas in standard conditions, yes.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top