Spontaneous symmetry breaking in the standard model

synoe
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
In the standard model, the Lagrangian contains scalar and spinor and vector fields. But when we consider spontaneous symmetry breaking, we only account for the terms contain only scalar fields, " the scalar potential", in the Lagrangian. And if the scalar fields have vacuum expectation value, then we recognize the symmetry is broken spontaneously. Why don't we have to contain spinors and vectors? I think it's related to Lorentz invariance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
synoe said:
Why don't we have to contain spinors and vectors? I think it's related to Lorentz invariance.
If a spinor or vector had a nonzero expectation value, it would single out a preferred direction. The vacuum state must be rotationally invariant (Lorentz invariant too) so this is not possible.
 
Thank you, Bill_K.
Could you explan more formally or mathematically by using language of quantum theory?
I would like to proof \langle 0|\psi_\alpha|0\rangle=0 from Lorentz invariance of the vacuum. Your explanation seems that the vacuum expectation vales is supposed to be Lorentz invariant but I think Lorentz invariance means U^\dagger(\Lambda)|0\rangle=|0\rangle.

And another question occurred. Your explanation seems that the propagator, the vacuum expectation value of two point function also vanishes. Why propagators don't vanish even if they have Lorentz indices or spinor indices?
 
synoe said:
Thank you, Bill_K.
Could you explan more formally or mathematically by using language of quantum theory?
I would like to proof \langle 0|\psi_\alpha|0\rangle=0 from Lorentz invariance of the vacuum. Your explanation seems that the vacuum expectation vales is supposed to be Lorentz invariant but I think Lorentz invariance means U^\dagger(\Lambda)|0\rangle=|0\rangle.

And another question occurred. Your explanation seems that the propagator, the vacuum expectation value of two point function also vanishes. Why propagators don't vanish even if they have Lorentz indices or spinor indices?

See post#35 in
www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=172461

Sam
 

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Breaking of a local symmetry is impossible, so what about global symmetry....
Replies
4
Views
3K
A Question about S(3) spontaneous symmetry breaking in Peskin & Schroeder
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Spontaneous symmetry breaking from a QM perspective
Replies
34
Views
4K
A Why is the Higgs mechanism needed?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Constant field in the Lagrangian
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Could the Lorentz symmetry be theoretically broken in vacuum?
Replies
3
Views
3K
I What Does the Shape of the Higgs Potential Tell Us?
Replies
4
Views
3K
B Electroweak spontaneous symmetry breaking
Replies
11
Views
2K
A Spinor indices on Yukawa coupling terms in electroweak sector
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Spontaneous symmetry breaking of chiral symmetry
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top