Spontaniety of gas(Nitrogen) adsorption over solid(Zeolite).

  • Thread starter Thread starter AbhiNature
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Adsorption
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the spontaneity of nitrogen adsorption over zeolite, which the user calculated to be non-spontaneous based on the Gibbs free energy equation. They used the heat of vaporization and entropy values for nitrogen in gas and liquid states to arrive at a positive dG value, indicating non-spontaneity. The user speculates that external factors, such as pressure, might influence the adsorption process, potentially leading to a negative dG in practical scenarios. They express confusion over the discrepancy between their calculations and observed adsorption behavior at 300K. Clarification on the role of pressure and other conditions in adsorption spontaneity is sought.
AbhiNature
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello!

The other day I was reading about adsorption(gas over solid), and there it stated that it is a spontaneous process. I wanted to know how spontaneous the process is. I therefore took nitrogen adsorption over zeolite as a candidate to find its spontaneity, and to my surprise, my calculations showed it to be a non-spontaneous process. I guess I am wrong somewhere, but I just cannot find where.

Following are the calculations that I did;
dG = dH - T*dS
Assuming adsorption to be equivalent to converting gas to liquid.
Therefore,
dH = Heat of vaporization of Nitrogen = -5560J/mole
T = 300K (Adsorption at 300K).
S1 = Entropy of Nitrogen at 300K = 192J/moleK.
S2 = Entropy of Nitrogen in liquid form (I did not find entropy data of liquid Nitrogen, but I did find data at 100K) = 160J/moleK.

Which gives,
dG = 4040J/mole - non-spontaneous.

I saw a graph which showed quite a lot of adsorption at 300K.

I speculate that, adsorption needs pressure and the source of this pressure has more than enough negative dG?

Could you please help me understand this?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No reply? Not even an opinion?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top