Spread it over a large surface area?

AI Thread Summary
Spreading radioactive waste over a larger surface area does not accelerate its decay, as the decay process is intrinsic to the atoms themselves and remains unchanged regardless of their environment. Radioactive atoms decay over a series of half-lives, emitting harmful radiation until they transform into stable or other radioactive isotopes. While some decay rates can be minimally affected by specific conditions, such as packing in dense crystals, this is not a practical solution for waste management. Effective treatment methods for reactor waste include neutron irradiation or utilizing subcritical reactors with proton accelerators. Ultimately, the decay of individual uranium atoms still spans billions of years, making their management crucial.
Blenton
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
I assume there is something wrong with my thinking, but couldn't you be able to speed up the decay of radioactive waste by spreading it over a large surface area so that it could disperse its energy much better? I understand half life refers to the majority bulk of a material, but if you were to spread the material into individual atoms, what happens then?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The atoms decay when they decay. The environment they are in makes no difference.
 
Then individual uranium atoms are safe for about 4.7 billion years?
 
Blenton said:
Then individual uranium atoms are safe for about 4.7 billion years?

On average, yes :smile:
 
All radioactive atoms (nuclei of atoms) remain radioactive and potentially harmful for a few or many half-lives until they decay. Sometimes they decay into other radioactive atoms. They normally emit alphas, betas (electrons or positrons), or gamm rays. I have read that some low-Z electron-capture decay half lives can be changed by maybe 0.1% by packing them in dense crystals. The best way to treat reactor wastes (other than Yucca Mountain) is to irradiate them with neutrons or "burn" them up in a subcritical reactor that is assisted by a proton accelerator. See
http://www.wipp.energy.gov/science/adtf/ATW.pdf
 
Bob S said:
All radioactive atoms (nuclei of atoms) remain radioactive and potentially harmful for a few or many half-lives until they decay. Sometimes they decay into other radioactive atoms. They normally emit alphas, betas (electrons or positrons), or gamm rays. I have read that some low-Z electron-capture decay half lives can be changed by maybe 0.1% by packing them in dense crystals. The best way to treat reactor wastes (other than Yucca Mountain) is to irradiate them with neutrons or "burn" them up in a subcritical reactor that is assisted by a proton accelerator. See
http://www.wipp.energy.gov/science/adtf/ATW.pdf

Well that's very interesting, but the answer to the OP is as stated above: No, it does not matter if you "spread it out over a larger surface area."
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top