Spring characteristics when loaded with a mass

AI Thread Summary
When a spring is loaded with a mass, it extends according to Hooke's Law, regardless of whether it is vertical or coiled. Coiling a spring around an axle can save space but may introduce issues such as increased friction, which could affect the spring's performance and lifespan. The design resembles a retractable tape measure, where the spring extends and retracts with a load. However, friction between the coiled spring and its casing could impede movement and potentially stop it entirely. Proper research on spring mechanics and material selection is essential to mitigate these challenges.
Jeviah
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a spring is loaded with a mass, the spring being completely vertical and the mass hanging below it there would be an extension in the spring relative to the mass applied/force applied according to hookes law. If the same spring was not vertical but coiled (similar to a garter spring but not connected to itself) I assume that the extension would still be the same as if it was vertical. My question is would having a tension spring coiled in this manner have any adverse effects such as instability in the spring, reducing the springs life span etc?

My reasoning behind this question is that coiling a spring in this manner will allow for the spring to extend as much as required while housing it in a much smaller area. I have read about constant force springs however as they do not obey hookes law and I have not/will not cover them in my studies I would prefer to avoid using them.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


N/A
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jeviah said:
I assume that the extension would still be the same as if it was vertical
On this garter spring, where would you hang the mass you mention / apply the extending force ?
And: if not connected to itself, then: connected to what ?
 
Jeviah said:
was not vertical but coiled
Coiled around what, and how many times?
A rope coiled around a post experiences friction that grows exponentially with the arc length. I think you would quickly run into that problem with your coiled up spring.
 
Sorry that was a poor description on my part. So my plan is to coil a spring around an axle/wheel essentially, one end attached to the axle/wheel the other end attached to a load that can be removed. The load pulls on the spring and the spring extends, when the load is removed the spring would retract to its original position. The spring will have some flexible casing around it so it doesn't get tangled, also the materials used would be smooth with the hopes of reducing the friction. Friction between surfaces is undesirable but not a deal breaker as it would only slow down the extension/retraction of the spring. The best way I can describe it is that the design would be similar to a retractable tape measure, replacing the tape with a spring.

How many times it would be coiled around the axle I am unsure of at this point as I would need to research springs first and what maximum extension I need.
 
Jeviah said:
it would only slow down the extension/retraction of the spring.
No, it could stop it entirely.
Jeviah said:
similar to a retractable tape measure
The analogy doesn't quite work. The tape itself does not stretch. But at the centre of the holder there could be a coiled band, like a clockwork spring.
Clockwork springs can stick and need some lubrication, but they do have the advantage of being a flat strip of metal. I can't see the problem as being as easily solved with your flexible casing.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top