SPRING CONSTANT- simple harmonic motion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring the spring constant in the context of damped oscillations, specifically when a mass is held between two springs. Participants explore different methods for measuring the spring constant and how to relate the spring constants of individual springs to the effective spring constant when configured in this manner.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes measuring the spring constant by hanging masses from a single vertical spring and graphing the force against elongation, expressing doubt about the validity of this method.
  • Another participant asserts that the described method is acceptable for measuring the spring constant and prompts a discussion on how to find the effective spring constant when two springs are used.
  • There is a suggestion that the effective spring constant for two springs held in parallel is greater than that of each individual spring, but this is contested with a participant mentioning the configuration of the mass being between the two springs.
  • Some participants propose using a pulley system as a method to measure the effective spring constant, while others question the necessity of complicating the setup.
  • There is a call for an equation that relates individual spring constants to the effective spring constant in the specific configuration of two identical springs on either side of the mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the initial measurement method and the appropriate approach to determine the effective spring constant. There is no consensus on the best method or the relationship between the individual and effective spring constants in the given setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to apply Hooke's law and explore the implications of different configurations of springs, but the discussion does not resolve the mathematical relationships or assumptions involved.

linyen416
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm investigating damped oscillations using a mass held between two springs.
In the experiment, I measured the spring constant using a method which now doesn't make sense.

I measured it by hanging masses from ONE vertical spring and graphing the force exerted by spring (mass times 9.8) against the elongation of spring

I think that's wrong. I think I should have used a pulley or something like this:
the glider is held between two springs. Record its equilibrium
position.
2. Attach a piece of audio tape to the glider and lay it across the “air
pulley” with a small mass suspended on the end of the tape.
3. Measure the displacement of the glider from equilibrium for 4
different hanging masses.
4. Graph the weight of the hanging mass (y axis) vs. the measured
displacement.

But I don't even understand how this method works. What does it mean by attaching a piece of tape to the glider and laying it across the 'air pulley'?

My second and main concern is that because I cannot redo the experiment, I have to somehow use the k values that I've measured using the masses hanging on the single spring. How can I fix the k values to get one that will equal the k value resulting from two springs, one on each side of the mass?

URGENT!
any input appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
linyen416 said:
I measured it by hanging masses from ONE vertical spring and graphing the force exerted by spring (mass times 9.8) against the elongation of spring
That's a perfectly fine way to measure the spring constant. I assume you measured the spring constant of each spring?
My second and main concern is that because I cannot redo the experiment, I have to somehow use the k values that I've measured using the masses hanging on the single spring. How can I fix the k values to get one that will equal the k value resulting from two springs, one on each side of the mass?
How do you find the effective spring constant of the two springs together? Hint: With a spring attached to each end, is the effective spring constant greater or less than each individual spring constant?

To figure that out, imagine the mass between both springs in equilibrium. Pull it a distance X to one side. What net force (due to both springs) acts on the mass? Set that net force equal to KX, where K is the effective spring constant.
 
I think I know what you're saying Doc. If you put two springs in seires then the effective spring constant is k times two

But my situation is where the mass is held BETWEEN the two springs.
 
So I think one way to get the effective spring constant is to use a pulley somehow.
 
unless there's an equation that relates the individual spring constants to the effective spring constant when the mass is held between two identical springs
 
linyen416 said:
I think I know what you're saying Doc. If you put two springs in seires then the effective spring constant is k times two
You have it backwards.
But my situation is where the mass is held BETWEEN the two springs.
I know. :wink:
linyen416 said:
So I think one way to get the effective spring constant is to use a pulley somehow.
Huh? No need to complicate things by adding a pulley to the mix.

The way to get the effective spring constant is to do what I said in my last post. (You'll have to apply Hooke's law.)
linyen416 said:
unless there's an equation that relates the individual spring constants to the effective spring constant when the mass is held between two identical springs
Of course there is. But rather than look for such an equation in a book (you might get lucky!), just figure it out for yourself by doing what I suggested.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
873
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K