Spring gun problem can't find start

  • Thread starter Thread starter JWDavid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gun Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary compression of a spring-loaded gun to hit a target 2.20 meters away, given that a previous shot fell short by 27 cm with a 1.10 cm compression. The participant expresses frustration over missing key variables such as the mass of the projectile and the spring constant, complicating the use of energy equations and projectile motion formulas. A suggestion is made to increase the spring compression proportionally based on the horizontal velocity needed to reach the target distance. The solution indicates that the new compression should be approximately 220/193 of the initial 1.10 cm. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between energy, velocity, and distance in projectile motion.
JWDavid
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


spring-loaded gun on tabletop. Target box 2.20m horizontally from edge of table on floor.
Shot 1 - spring compressed 1.10 cm - falls 27 cm short.
How far should the spring be compressed to hit the target with shot 2?


Homework Equations


GPE1 + SPE1 + KE1 = GPE2 + SPE2 + KE2<br>
0 + k(x2)/2 + 0 = mgh + 0 + 0


The Attempt at a Solution


I've been beating myself up trying to solve this one and the next one I'll post and I don't know where to start. <p>
I tried:<br>
to use a range solution (V2Sin(2Theta)/g) and cut it in half to get the initial velocity so I could attempt to figure out KE (mV2/2 - but don't have an angle<p>
to figure out time of flight - but don't have the height of the table<p>
I don't have a spring constant for it. And I just don't think I should be using proportions to determine the answer, not this late in a physics (w/calculus) class.<p>
I don't know where to start, and btw it didn't give me mass either.<P?
Thanks in advance
o
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See "Spring and projectile problem" on Nov 30. Same problem, already discussed on the forum.
 
JWDavid said:

Homework Statement


spring-loaded gun on tabletop. Target box 2.20m horizontally from edge of table on floor.
Shot 1 - spring compressed 1.10 cm - falls 27 cm short.
How far should the spring be compressed to hit the target with shot 2?

Homework Equations


GPE1 + SPE1 + KE1 = GPE2 + SPE2 + KE2<br>
0 + k(x2)/2 + 0 = mgh + 0 + 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been beating myself up trying to solve this one and the next one I'll post and I don't know where to start. <p>
I tried:<br>
to use a range solution (V2Sin(2Theta)/g) and cut it in half to get the initial velocity so I could attempt to figure out KE (mV2/2 - but don't have an angle<p>
to figure out time of flight - but don't have the height of the table<p>
I don't have a spring constant for it. And I just don't think I should be using proportions to determine the answer, not this late in a physics (w/calculus) class.<p>
I don't know where to start, and btw it didn't give me mass either.<P?
Thanks in advance
o


Whatever the height of the table you know that the horizontal velocity times the time to fall is short i.e. too slow. So to get to the proper distance the horizontal speed needs to be increased to 220/193 of whatever speed it comes off the top of the table.

Working backward, the v will come from the kinetic energy that came from the potential energy of the spring in the gun. Since the mass and the spring constant are invariant that means that the x is proportional to the v.

So ... that means that if the x is 220/193 of the 1.1 cm you might have a better chance?
 
Thank you both, I understand LowlyPion's answer better, but I think I learned more from figuring out how to get where nasu's answer pointed. Thanks again.
 
JWDavid said:
Thank you both, I understand LowlyPion's answer better, but I think I learned more from figuring out how to get where nasu's answer pointed. Thanks again.

I just read the other thread. It can be found here. (Not Nov 30, Oct 30)
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=268009

Interesting ... but a long way around the barn I think.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top