Spring gun problem without a spring constant.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a spring gun that fires a ball both horizontally and vertically, with the goal of determining how high the ball will rise when fired straight up. The context includes concepts from kinematics and energy conservation, but the spring constant is not provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using kinematics to find initial velocity and consider the conservation of energy. There is uncertainty about the relevance of the spring constant and how to incorporate it into the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the spring's role may be negligible, advocating for a focus on kinematics instead. Others express confusion about how to proceed without the spring constant, indicating a mix of interpretations and approaches being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of information regarding the spring compression and its effect on the problem, which some participants are questioning. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the concepts involved.

Alpha Russ Omega
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello:
I'm stuck on this following problem.

A spring gun, held horizontally 1.6 meters above the ground, fires a 0.07 kilogram ball so that it lands a horizontal distance of 2.3 meters away. If the gun is pointed straight up, and the same ball is fired, how high (in meters) will it rise?

I know that: (Potential gravity) = (mass) x (gravity) x (height)
Also: (Spring potential) = (1/2) x (k) x (x^2)

I'm not really sure how to tie the two together...

Also, I'm thinking of using the conservation of energy formula:
(final kinetic + final potential gravity + final spring potential) = (initial kinetic + initial potential gravity + initial spring potential)
but I don't know how to get to the spring constant (k) with the given information in this problem.

Any help would be appreciated. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spring has nothing to do with it, youre better off with kinematics. Figure out the initial velocity in the x for the first fire
 
I considered the kinematics of this problem. I used two kinematics equations, one solving for time (using the height of the gun off the ground) and the other considering gravity and set them equal to each other. That's how I got velocity (approx 4 m/s). Then I applied the conservation of energy theorem for the moment right after the bullet leaves the gun (initial) right before it hits the ground (final). This is where the spring constant and the x (spring compression) come into play. Are you sure this problem can be done by completely disregarding the spring? Even though I got the velocity, I still don't know how to deal with not having the spring compression.
 
TurdFerguson is right, this problem would be the same if you were just throwing the object, so pretend there is no spring at all.

I'm a little rusty, but isn't the pot. energy mgh?
 
ultimateguy said:
TurdFerguson is right, this problem would be the same if you were just throwing the object, so pretend there is no spring at all.

I'm a little rusty, but isn't the pot. energy mgh?

Yup.
(gravitational potential energy) = m x g x h

I'm still stuck on this one. :frown:
I'm not sure what to do after finding the velocity.
 
This problem was solved by finding time with a kinematic equation on the y-axis. Once that was found, I put the time into an another kinematic equation in order to find velocity on the x-axis. This velocity was used with a conservation of energy equation. So, through this final conservation equation the height was found.

Thank you for the hints! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K