Spring Mechanics homework problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the acceleration of weights connected by springs when the top spring is cut. The initial assumption is that the top weight will have an acceleration equal to gravity (a = g), while the bottom weight will have an acceleration of zero (a = 0). However, it is clarified that the top weight actually experiences an acceleration greater than g due to the force of the stretched spring, while the bottom weight remains stationary. The importance of considering the forces acting on each mass and the instantaneous effects of cutting the spring is emphasized. Overall, the consensus is that the top weight's acceleration exceeds g, contradicting the teacher's initial belief.
aviv87
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
There are N weights, each of mass M, connected as shown.
At the moment of cutting the top spring, what will be the acceleration of the top and bottom weights?

Thanks ahead :biggrin:
 

Attachments

  • physics.JPG
    physics.JPG
    4.8 KB · Views: 416
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
my guess is that the one on the top will have a=ng and the one on the bottom a=0.
is that right?
 
Since your attachment is not yet viewable, you'll have to describe the arrangement to get any help. What work have you done?
 
there's a spring connected to a ceiling. a mass M is connected to it, to her another spring is connected, another mass etc' for N masses.
ceiling
-----
/
\
/
M
\
/
\
M
\
/
\
M

Does this help? :smile:
 
aviv87 said:
my guess is that the one on the top will have a=ng and the one on the bottom a=0.
Sounds right to me. But no need to guess. Consider the forces on each mass, and the fact that the springs won't change lengths instantly.
 
Doc Al said:
Sounds right to me. But no need to guess. Consider the forces on each mass, and the fact that the springs won't change lengths instantly.

Well, that's what I got, but my physics teacher said he thinks it's a=0 for the bottom one, but that the one on top would have a<g, but he wasn't sure.
That made me think I did something wrong...
 
aviv87 said:
Well, that's what I got, but my physics teacher said he thinks it's a=0 for the bottom one, but that the one on top would have a<g, but he wasn't sure.
I don't see how he could think that the one on top could have an acceleration less than g. If the only force on it were gravity, a = g. But you've also got a stretched spring pulling it down, so a > g. Ask him to explain his reasoning. :smile:
 
Doc Al said:
I don't see how he could think that the one on top could have an acceleration less than g. If the only force on it were gravity, a = g. But you've also got a stretched spring pulling it down, so a > g. Ask him to explain his reasoning. :smile:

My thoughts exactly :approve:
Well, I guess he wasn't paying enough attention or something...
Thanks!
 
Back
Top