Springs Question - Second Order O.D.E

tedwillis
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I was wondering is you could help me with this springs question. We've only done springs hanging from a fixed support above being stretched, but now I've got a question where the spirng is being compressed.

Homework Statement


So, here's some basic info about the question
  • Obviously, acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s^2
  • The downward direction is considered the positive direction
  • A spring is placed on a fixed support standing vertically
  • The natural length of the spring is 5 metres
  • An iron ball weighing 5kg is attached to the top of it
  • This mass compresses the spring by 0.392m
  • The ball is pulled to a distance of 0.4m above its equalibirum position then released
  • Damping force is proportional to the instantaneous velocity of the ball
  • y(t)=The displacement of the ball below the equalibrium position at t seconds after the release

Homework Equations


So, the first question is to proove that the equation of motion for the ball is...
  • 0=y''(t)+(b/5)y'(t)+25y(t), where b kg/s is the damping constant

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is a rough diagram of what I believe to be happening from the description of the problem:
Untitled_3.png


So, with Hooke's law
T=mg
ks=mg (equation 1)
k=mg/s
k=(5*9.8)/(-0.392)
k=-125

With Newton's law of motion (F=ma):
m*y''(t)=mg-T-R
m*y''(t)=mg-k(s+y(t))-by'(t)
m*y''(t)=mg-ks-ky(t)-by'(t), from equation 1: ks-mg=0 so
m*y''(t)+ky(t)+by'(t)=0, So subbing in k=-125, m=5
5*y''(t)-125y(t)+by'(t)=0
y''(t)+b/5y'(t)-25y(t)=0

This is almost what I need, but for some reason I have -25y(t) instead of +25y(t). Can anyone see where I've gone wrong? The only thing I can think of is that k (and thus s) should be positive, but I am unsure why as it is in compression. We have been taught that stretching (extension) of the spring make "s" a postive number, so one would think that compression of the spring would make give "s" a negative value. Is k always > 0 by definition?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have s- y when you should have y- s. Suppose y is very large. Then s- y will be negative so -k(s- y) will be positive and y''= -k(s- y) would be positive meaning that y will get larger. It should be the other way around- the spring should move y back toward the center. You should have either y''= k(s- y) or y''= -k(y- s).
 
HallsofIvy said:
You have s- y when you should have y- s. Suppose y is very large. Then s- y will be negative so -k(s- y) will be positive and y''= -k(s- y) would be positive meaning that y will get larger. It should be the other way around- the spring should move y back toward the center. You should have either y''= k(s- y) or y''= -k(y- s).

Woops. That was a typo actually.

It should say my''(t)=mg-k(s+y(t))-by'(t) instead, and this is the path that the following calculations take.

In this sense, I am saying that the restoring force of the spring’s tension (T) is equal to the spring constant*(contraction (or extension)+y(t) (the distance below the equalibrium position)). Either I am not understanding you or the subject matter correctly or you have found the wrong error, simply a badly placed typo. Sorry on my behalf.

I'll fix the error up in the OP.
 
Last edited:
m*y'' = mg - T - R

my'' = mg - k(s-y) - By'

We write -k(s+y) because the spring is stretched but in this case spring is compressing that is why we use -k(s-y)
Hope it makes sense.
Cheers
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top