Square of a finite deltafunction

  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Square
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hi. I'm reading "Quantum Field Theory - Mandl and Shaw" about how to derive the cross-section and in the derivation the authors make the following argument

"For large values of T and V, we can then take

\delta_{TV}(\sum p_f' - \sum p_i) = (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(\sum p'_f - \sum p_i)
and
(**) (\delta_{TV}(\sum p_f' - \sum p_i))^2 = TV(2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(\sum p'_f - \sum p_i)"

where they earlier have defined

(2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(\sum p'_f - \sum p_i) = \lim_{T,V \to \infty} \delta_{TV}(\sum p_f' - \sum p_i) = \lim_{T,V \to \infty} \int_{-T/2}^{T/2}dt\int_V d^3x \exp ( i x( \sum p_f' - \sum p_i)).

My question is how they get in a TV factor when they take the square of that finite delta function in equation (**)? The argument is found in full detail in

http://books.google.no/books?id=Ef4...no&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false

at page 129. And the equation that I'm wondering about it (8.5).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Their derivation can be understood in this way:

Let \delta_T (\omega) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} e^{-i\omega t} ~dt. It can be shown that approximately

<br /> \int_R \delta_T (\omega) f(\omega) ~d\omega \approx f(0),<br />

so this function behaves similarly as the δ distribution.

Now, what is ( \delta_T(\omega) ) ^2? This can be attributed meaning of a distribution. The integral

<br /> I = \int_R \delta_T(\omega) ^2 f(\omega)~d\omega<br />

can be calculated approximately in this way:

<br /> I = \int_R \delta_T(\omega) [ \delta_T(\omega) f(\omega) ]~d\omega \approx \delta_T(0) f(0)<br />

Since \delta_T(0) = T, we obtain

<br /> I \approx Tf(0).<br />

From this we infer that the expression \delta_T ^2 behaves, under the integral, almost as the function T\delta_T(\omega).

But I would like to say that these are just approximate formulae and one should be careful about using them.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top