Square of a finite deltafunction

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Square
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the cross-section in Quantum Field Theory as presented in "Quantum Field Theory - Mandl and Shaw." Specifically, it addresses the transition from the finite delta function, denoted as δ_{TV}, to its squared form, which introduces a factor of TV. The authors establish that as T and V approach infinity, the finite delta function behaves similarly to the four-dimensional delta function, (2π)^4 δ^{(4)}. The key insight is that the square of the finite delta function can be interpreted as T times the delta function, leading to the conclusion that (δ_T(ω))^2 approximates Tδ_T(ω).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory concepts
  • Familiarity with delta functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of delta functions in distribution theory
  • Explore the implications of the Fourier transform in Quantum Field Theory
  • Learn about the derivation of cross-sections in particle physics
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of limits in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those studying Quantum Field Theory, as well as mathematicians interested in the applications of delta functions in physics.

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hi. I'm reading "Quantum Field Theory - Mandl and Shaw" about how to derive the cross-section and in the derivation the authors make the following argument

"For large values of T and V, we can then take

[tex]\delta_{TV}(\sum p_f' - \sum p_i) = (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(\sum p'_f - \sum p_i)[/tex]
and
[tex](**) (\delta_{TV}(\sum p_f' - \sum p_i))^2 = TV(2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(\sum p'_f - \sum p_i)[/tex]"

where they earlier have defined

[tex](2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(\sum p'_f - \sum p_i) = \lim_{T,V \to \infty} \delta_{TV}(\sum p_f' - \sum p_i) = \lim_{T,V \to \infty} \int_{-T/2}^{T/2}dt\int_V d^3x \exp ( i x( \sum p_f' - \sum p_i)).[/tex]

My question is how they get in a TV factor when they take the square of that finite delta function in equation (**)? The argument is found in full detail in

http://books.google.no/books?id=Ef4...no&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false

at page 129. And the equation that I'm wondering about it (8.5).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Their derivation can be understood in this way:

Let [itex]\delta_T (\omega) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} e^{-i\omega t} ~dt[/itex]. It can be shown that approximately

[tex] \int_R \delta_T (\omega) f(\omega) ~d\omega \approx f(0),[/tex]

so this function behaves similarly as the δ distribution.

Now, what is [itex]( \delta_T(\omega) ) ^2[/itex]? This can be attributed meaning of a distribution. The integral

[tex] I = \int_R \delta_T(\omega) ^2 f(\omega)~d\omega[/tex]

can be calculated approximately in this way:

[tex] I = \int_R \delta_T(\omega) [ \delta_T(\omega) f(\omega) ]~d\omega \approx \delta_T(0) f(0)[/tex]

Since [itex]\delta_T(0) = T[/itex], we obtain

[tex] I \approx Tf(0).[/tex]

From this we infer that the expression [itex]\delta_T ^2[/itex] behaves, under the integral, almost as the function [itex]T\delta_T(\omega)[/itex].

But I would like to say that these are just approximate formulae and one should be careful about using them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K